You are not logged in.

Densities of individually marked migrants away from the marking site to estimate population sizes : a test with three wader populations

Spaans, Bernard, van Kooten, Laurens, Cremer, Jenny, Leyrer, Jutta and Piersma, Theunis 2011, Densities of individually marked migrants away from the marking site to estimate population sizes : a test with three wader populations, Bird study, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 130-140, doi: 10.1080/00063657.2011.566601.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Densities of individually marked migrants away from the marking site to estimate population sizes : a test with three wader populations
Author(s) Spaans, Bernard
van Kooten, Laurens
Cremer, Jenny
Leyrer, Jutta
Piersma, Theunis
Journal name Bird study
Volume number 58
Issue number 2
Start page 130
End page 140
Total pages 11
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication Oxfordshire, U. K.
Publication date 2011
ISSN 0006-3657
1944-6705
Keyword(s) conspecific
marking method
migratory population
population density
population distribution
population estimation
population size
survival
wader
Summary Capsule Population estimates based on the mark–resighting method can be a useful alternative to population-wide counts.

Aims To investigate whether the mark–resighting method can be used as an alternative to counts to estimate the size of wader populations.

Methods Individual colour-marking and subsequent resightings allowed accurate estimates of annual survival for three populations of waders, on which basis we could estimate the actual number of marked birds alive. Densities of marked birds were determined on sites away (2000–4300 km) from the ringing locations expecting marked birds to be randomly distributed among non-marked conspecifics. Population sizes are estimated by combining these densities with the number of marked birds alive.

Results We found indications that the distribution of marked birds was indeed random in the locations away from the site of marking. The estimated population size of Red Knot Calidris canutus canutus was in accordance with the most recent estimates based on counts. Our estimate of the Calidris c. islandica population was somewhat lower, and that of the Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica taymyrensis population was considerably lower than the latest estimates based on counts.

Conclusion Population estimates based on the mark–resighting method can be a useful alternative for, or addition to, population-wide counts, as long as the assumption of random distribution of marked birds at the reading sites is taken into account. We conclude that the Afro-Siberian Bar-tailed Godwit population has recently decreased in size or has been substantially overestimated during the counts.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/00063657.2011.566601
Field of Research 060207 Population Ecology
Socio Economic Objective 960802 Coastal and Estuarine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, British Trust for Ornithology
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30039241

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 59 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 24 Oct 2011, 11:48:39 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.