Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
Ridgers, Nicola D., Salmon, Jo, Ridley, Kate, O'Connell, Eoin, Arundell, Lauren and Timperio, Anna 2012, Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time, International journal of behavioural nutrition and physical activity, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 1-18.
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Background Accelerometers have been used to determine the amount of time that children spend sedentary. However, as time spent sitting may be detrimental to health, research is needed to examine whether accelerometer sedentary cut-points reflect the amount of time children spend sitting. The aim of this study was to: a) examine agreement between ActiGraph (AG) cut-points for sedentary time and objectively-assessed periods of free-living sitting and sitting plus standing time using the activPAL (aP); and b) identify cut-points to determine time spent sitting and sitting plus standing.
Methods Forty-eight children (54% boys) aged 8–12 years wore a waist-mounted AG and thigh-mounted aP for two consecutive school days (9–3:30 pm). AG data were analyzed using 17 cut-points between 50–850 counts·min−1 in 50 counts·min−1 increments to determine sedentary time during class-time, break time and school hours. Sitting and sitting plus standing time were obtained from the aP for these periods. Limits of agreement were computed to evaluate bias between AG50 to AG850 sedentary time and sitting and sitting plus standing time. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses identified AG cutpoints that maximized sensitivity and specificity for sitting and sitting plus standing time.
Results The smallest mean bias between aP sitting time and AG sedentary time was AG150 for class time (3.8 minutes), AG50 for break time (−0.8 minutes), and AG100 for school hours (−5.2 minutes). For sitting plus standing time, the smallest bias was observed for AG850. ROC analyses revealed an optimal cut-point of 96 counts·min−1 (AUC = 0.75) for sitting time, which had acceptable sensitivity (71.7%) and specificity (67.8%). No optimal cut-point was obtained for sitting plus standing (AUC = 0.51).
Conclusions Estimates of free-living sitting time in children during school hours can be obtained using an AG cut-point of 100 counts·min−1. Higher sedentary cut-points may capture both sitting and standing time.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Field of Research
110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective
920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.