Residents' perspectives on urinary incontinence : a review of literature

Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, O'Connell, Bev and Dunning, Trisha 2012, Residents' perspectives on urinary incontinence : a review of literature, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 761-772, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00959.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Residents' perspectives on urinary incontinence : a review of literature
Author(s) Ostaszkiewicz, JoanORCID iD for Ostaszkiewicz, Joan orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-4493
O'Connell, Bev
Dunning, TrishaORCID iD for Dunning, Trisha orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-1706
Journal name Scandinavian journal of caring sciences
Volume number 26
Issue number 4
Start page 761
End page 772
Total pages 12
Publisher Wiley - Blackwell Publishing
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2012-12
ISSN 0283-9318
1471-6712
Keyword(s) literature review
incontinence
residential aged care
nursing homes
satisfaction
preferences
perspectives
cognitive impairment
quality of life
elderly
Summary Background: Individuals in residential aged care facilities experience urinary incontinence more than any other single population. Despite these factors, the impact of the condition on their quality of life, their perspectives of living with the condition, and their preferences for care have received little research attention.

Aim: To provide a descriptive overview of research about; the impact of urinary incontinence on residents’ quality of life; residents’ perspectives of having urinary incontinence; and their preferences for continence care’.

Design: A descriptive review of literature.

Method: A broad search was undertaken for qualitative and quantitative research that evaluated residents’ quality of life related to urinary incontinence; their perspectives on having urinary incontinence, and their preferences for managing it. Data were displayed in tabular format, summarized, and described.

Results: Ten studies were identified and reviewed (six qualitative and four quantitative). They reveal many residents’ value having independent bowel and bladder function, but believe that incontinence in inevitable and intractable. Some adopt self management strategies, however considerable barriers hinder their ability to maintain continence and manage incontinence. Residents often have low expectations, and hence decline further evaluation and treatment. Some express satisfaction with continence care even if this care is not consistent with their preferences. Little is known about how cognitively impaired residents perceive their condition. However some individuals with cognitive impairment respond with acute anxiety when carers’ attempt to provide continence care.

Conclusion: Residents’ perspectives on incontinence and preferences for continence care relate to low expectations for improvement. Such misconceptions should be addressed and residents and their family members should be given a range of options from which to choose. As urinary incontinence impacts on residents’ quality of life, it is also important that continence care is delivered in a participative and sensitive way.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00959.x
Field of Research 111001 Aged Care Nursing
Socio Economic Objective 920119 Urogenital System and Disorders
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30042991

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 12 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 621 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 06 Mar 2012, 14:14:35 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.