You are not logged in.

Feasibility of repeated 24-h dietary recalls combined with a food-recording booklet, using EPIC-Soft, among preschoolers

Trolle, E., Amiano, P., Ege, M., Bower, E., Lioret, S., Brants, H., Kaic-Rak, A., de Boer, E. J. and Andersen, L. F. 2011, Feasibility of repeated 24-h dietary recalls combined with a food-recording booklet, using EPIC-Soft, among preschoolers, European journal of clinical nutrition, vol. 65, no. Supplement 1, pp. S84-S86, doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.91.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Feasibility of repeated 24-h dietary recalls combined with a food-recording booklet, using EPIC-Soft, among preschoolers
Author(s) Trolle, E.
Amiano, P.
Ege, M.
Bower, E.
Lioret, S.
Brants, H.
Kaic-Rak, A.
de Boer, E. J.
Andersen, L. F.
Journal name European journal of clinical nutrition
Volume number 65
Issue number Supplement 1
Start page S84
End page S86
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2011-07
ISSN 0954-3007
Keyword(s) children
dietary survey
pan-European
24-h dietary recalls
food recording
feasibility
Summary Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the feasibility among preschoolers of the 224-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) method combined with a food-recording booklet (FRB), using EPIC-Soft pc-program for the 24-HDR (the software developed to conduct 24-HDRs in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study).
Subjects/Methods: A total of 20 and 25 (4- to 5-year-old) children were recruited, as a convenience sample, through worksites or day or healthcare in Denmark and Spain, respectively. One parent (or both parents together) completed two face-to-face 24- HDR, combined with an optional use of a FRB. Feasibility was evaluated by evaluation questionnaires completed by parents and interviewers.
Results: The face-to-face interviews were primarily conducted with the mothers. The FRB was used by 90% of the participants, and proxy persons, other than the parent, were also involved; involvement of proxy persons seems necessary in a majority of the recalls in both the countries.
Conclusions: The results suggest that 224-HDR with one parent combined with a FRB is feasible for registering preschoolers’ diet. An FRB and/or information from proxy persons, other than the parent, is needed for a majority of the parents. In future studies, it may be beneficial to develop the FRB more like a structured food record (FR), which might, in principle, change the method to a one-day FR method from more than a 24-HDR method. It is recommended then to further investigate the use of EPIC-Soft as a data-entry tool.
Language eng
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2011.91
Field of Research 111199 Nutrition and Dietetics not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920411 Nutrition
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30043901

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 75 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 28 Mar 2012, 12:33:16 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.