Improving biodiversity monitoring

Lindenmayer, David B., Gibbons, Philip, Bourke, Max, Burgman, Mark, Dickman, Chris R., Ferrier, Simon, Fitzsimons, James, Freudenberger, David, Garnett, Stephen T., Groves, Craig, Hobbs, Richard J., Kingsford, Richard T., Krebs, Charles, Legge, Sarah, Lowe, Andrew J., Mclean, Rob, Montambault, Jensen, Possingham, Hugh, Radford, Jim, Robinson, Doug, Smallbone, Lisa, Thomas, David, Varcoe, Tony, Vardon, Michael, Wardle, Glenda, Woinarski, John and Zerger, Andre 2012, Improving biodiversity monitoring, Austral ecology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 285-294.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Improving biodiversity monitoring
Author(s) Lindenmayer, David B.
Gibbons, Philip
Bourke, Max
Burgman, Mark
Dickman, Chris R.
Ferrier, Simon
Fitzsimons, James
Freudenberger, David
Garnett, Stephen T.
Groves, Craig
Hobbs, Richard J.
Kingsford, Richard T.
Krebs, Charles
Legge, Sarah
Lowe, Andrew J.
Mclean, Rob
Montambault, Jensen
Possingham, Hugh
Radford, Jim
Robinson, Doug
Smallbone, Lisa
Thomas, David
Varcoe, Tony
Vardon, Michael
Wardle, Glenda
Woinarski, John
Zerger, Andre
Journal name Austral ecology
Volume number 37
Issue number 3
Start page 285
End page 294
Total pages 10
Publisher Wiley - Blackwell Publishing Asia
Place of publication Richmond, Vic.
Publication date 2012-05
ISSN 1442-9985
1442-9993
Keyword(s) biodiversity
conservation effectiveness
management intervention
monitoring
national biodiversity strategy
Summary Effective biodiversity monitoring is critical to evaluate, learn from, and ultimately improve conservation practice. Well conceived, designed and implemented monitoring of biodiversity should: (i) deliver information on trends in key aspects of biodiversity (e.g. population changes); (ii) provide early warning of problems that might otherwise be difficult or expensive to reverse; (iii) generate quantifiable evidence of conservation successes (e.g. species recovery following management) and conservation failures; (iv) highlight ways to make management more effective; and (v) provide information on return on conservation investment. The importance of effective biodiversity monitoring is widely recognized (e.g. Australian Biodiversity Strategy). Yet, while everyone thinks biodiversity monitoring is a good idea, this has not translated into a culture of sound biodiversity monitoring, or widespread use of monitoring data. We identify four barriers to more effective biodiversity monitoring in Australia. These are: (i) many conservation programmes have poorly articulated or vague objectives against which it is difficult to measure progress contributing to design and implementation problems; (ii) the case for long-term and sustained biodiversity monitoring is often poorly developed and/or articulated; (iii) there is often a lack of appropriate institutional support, co-ordination, and targeted funding for biodiversity monitoring; and (iv) there is often a lack of appropriate standards to guide monitoring activities and make data available from these programmes. To deal with these issues, we suggest that policy makers, resource managers and scientists better and more explicitly articulate the objectives of biodiversity monitoring and better demonstrate the case for greater investments in biodiversitymonitoring. There is an urgent need for improved institutional support for biodiversity monitoring in Australia, for improved monitoring standards, and for improved archiving of, and access to, monitoring data. We suggest that more strategic financial, institutional and intellectual investments in monitoring will lead to more efficient use of the resources available for biodiversity conservation and ultimately better conservation outcomes.
Language eng
Field of Research 069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2011, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047062

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 12 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 45 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 13 Aug 2012, 13:11:28 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.