The article focuses on the neo-Fregean's claim that syntactic priority thesis (SP) can constitute a decision-procedure in relation to substantive ontological disputes. It examines alternative interpretations of SP and demonstrates why SP cannot settle disputes about the existence of numbers or deliver on the stronger meta-ontological claims made on behalf it. Problems associated with the attempt to establish ontological theses through logical and linguistic analysis are tackled.
Field of Research
220313 Philosophy of Language
Socio Economic Objective
970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
HERDC Research category
C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.