You are not logged in.

The role of hegemony in secessionist movements : the case study of the Moldovan Republic of Transnistria

Laoutides, Costas 2008, The role of hegemony in secessionist movements : the case study of the Moldovan Republic of Transnistria, Science and society : journal of political and moral theory, vol. 20, pp. 143-169.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The role of hegemony in secessionist movements : the case study of the Moldovan Republic of Transnistria
Author(s) Laoutides, Costas
Journal name Science and society : journal of political and moral theory
Volume number 20
Start page 143
End page 169
Total pages 27
Publisher Ant. N. Sakkoulas Publishers
Place of publication [unknown]
Publication date 2008
ISSN 1108-3697
Keyword(s) secession
hegemony
transnistria
critical realism
Summary The aim of the article is to analyse the secessionist phenomenon by applying the concept of hegemony. Based on critical realist interpretations of the concept, it is argued that hegemonic practice incorporates both inter-subjective and structural aspects. The inter-subjective aspect of hegemony places emphasis on the relations between social groups and the way hegemonic practice leads social agents towards political projects that secure consensus in favour of the interest of particular elites. The structural character of hegemonic practice is evident in the reproduction of social conditions and values that underlie the relations between social agents both globally and domestically. Accordingly, the inter-subjective character of secession as hegemonic practice is evident in the organization of social agents towards a political option (territorial separatism) to the extent that it serves the goals of certain elites. The sturctural aspect of secessionist practice is hegeminic because it reproduces international structures that tend to associate political organization with ethnicity at the state level. The analysis then turns to the case study of Transnistria in Moldova as an empirical illustration of the two tendencies of hegemonic practice in secessionist politics leading ot useful conclusions both for the case study in particular and the study of secession in general. 
Notes
ATTENTION ERA 2015 CLUSTER LEADERS: The Library does not currently have access to the research output associated with this record, please contact DRO staff for further information regarding access.drosupport@deakin.edu.au

Language eng
Field of Research 160607 International Relations
160609 Political Theory and Political Philosophy
Socio Economic Objective 940301 Defence and Security Policy
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
HERDC collection year 2008
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30051008

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 225 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 06 Mar 2013, 09:17:14 EST by costas

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.