You are not logged in.

Request mitigating devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic : a comparative study

Aldhulaee, Mohammed T. and Golebiowski, Zosia 2013, Request mitigating devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic : a comparative study, in The Fifth Annual Round Table, Monash University,.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Request mitigating devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic : a comparative study
Author(s) Aldhulaee, Mohammed T.
Golebiowski, Zosia
Conference name The Fifth Annual Round Table (2013 : Melbourne, Vic.)
Conference location Melbourne, Vic
Conference dates 21-22 Feb. 2013
Title of proceedings The Fifth Annual Round Table
Editor(s) [unknown]
Publication date 2013
Conference series The Fifth Annual Round Table
Publisher Monash University
Keyword(s) Requests mitigations
Iraqi Arabic
internal mitigation
external mitigation
Summary Speech acts realization in everyday interaction is seen as an important field to explore the impact of linguistic and cultural variations on cross-cultural communication and second language acquisition. The reported study investigates the use of request mitigating devices in Australian English and Iraqi Arabic. It explores the internal and external devices that speakers of the two languages use to mitigate the imposition force of requests and the impact of the linguistic and cultural parameters on this use. Request samples were collected from 14 native speakers of Australian English and 14 native speakers of Iraqi Arabic by means of eight role-play interviews. The mitigating devices were identified and classified according to a modified categorization scheme based on Blum-Kulka et al. (1989). Additional categories of mitigating devices were added to this scheme to meet the requirements of data analysis. These include consultative device (Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, 1984), questions (Trosborg, 1995), apology (Economidou-Kogetsidis, 2008), alerter (Schauer, 2007), closing (Al-Ali & Alawneh, 2010), and new categories: wish/hope statement and verbal incentive. The results showed that internal mitigating devices were more frequent in Australian English requests than in Iraqi Arabic requests, while external mitigating devices were equally pervasive in both groups. The two groups also used different semantic formulae of some mitigating devices in specific situations. The pervasive occurrence of external mitigators in both groups‟ requests is discussed in terms of volubility as a politeness strategy. It is suggested that the divergence between the two groups in their utilization of request mitigations is related to linguistic and cultural variations between the Australian and Iraqi languages and cultures.
Language eng
Field of Research 200322 Comparative Language Studies
Socio Economic Objective 950201 Communication Across Languages and Culture
HERDC Research category E2 Full written paper - non-refereed / Abstract reviewed
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30051636

Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: Faculty of Arts and Education
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 114 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 21 Mar 2013, 17:10:45 EST by Mohammed Tahir Kadhim Aldhulaee

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.