Openly accessible

Readiness for interprofessional learning : a cross-faculty comparison between architecture and occupational therapy students

Larkin, Helen, Hitch, Danielle, Watchorn, Valerie, Ang, Susan and Stagnitti, Karen 2013, Readiness for interprofessional learning : a cross-faculty comparison between architecture and occupational therapy students, Journal of interprofessional care, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 413-419.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
larkin-readinessforinter-2013.pdf Published version application/pdf 209.90KB 110

Title Readiness for interprofessional learning : a cross-faculty comparison between architecture and occupational therapy students
Author(s) Larkin, Helen
Hitch, Danielle
Watchorn, Valerie
Ang, Susan
Stagnitti, Karen
Journal name Journal of interprofessional care
Volume number 27
Issue number 5
Start page 413
End page 419
Total pages 7
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2013-09
ISSN 1356-1820
Keyword(s) architecture
interprofessional education
occupational therapy
survey
universal design
Summary Health and wellbeing includes a need for built environments to accommodate and be inclusive of the broadest range of people and a corresponding need to ensure graduates are ready to engage in this field of interprofessional and inter-industry practise. All too often, interprofessional education in higher education is neglected with a tendency towards educational silos, particularly at a cross-faculty level. This paper reports on an initiative that embedded universal design practice education into the curricula of first year architecture and third year occupational therapy students and evaluated the impact on students’ readiness for interprofessional learning. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was given to students at the beginning and end of the semester during which students participated in a variety of online and face-to-face curriculum initiatives. Results showed that at the beginning of semester, occupational therapy students were significantly more positive about interprofessional learning than their architecture counterparts. Post-results showed that this trend continued but that occupational therapy students became less positive on some items after the interprofessional learning experience. This study provides insights into the interprofessional learning experiences of a group of students who have not previously been studied within the available literature.
Language eng
Field of Research 130202 Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Development
Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30052677

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 62 Abstract Views, 113 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 27 May 2013, 11:26:34 EST by Helen Larkin

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.