Simulated jury decision making in online focus groups Tabak, Samantha J., Klettke, Bianca and Knight, Tess 2013, Simulated jury decision making in online focus groups, Qualitative research journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102-113, doi: 10.1108/14439881311314667. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads klettke-simulatedjury-post-2013.pdf Authors' post print application/pdf 87.59KB 299 Title Simulated jury decision making in online focus groups Author(s) Tabak, Samantha J. Klettke, Bianca orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-2435 Knight, Tess orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-9582 Journal name Qualitative research journal Volume number 3 Issue number 1 Start page 102 End page 113 Total pages 12 Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd Place of publication United Kingdom Publication date 2013 ISSN 1448-0980 Summary Purpose – A significant issue in jury research has been the use of individual jurors to analyse jury decision-making. This paper aimed to examine the applicability of computer-mediated communication to a mock jury deliberation study. Design/methodology/approach – Groups of three to five Australian residents anonymously attended a secure chat room and participated in a semi-structured discussion about a simulated child sexual assault scenario. Deliberation transcripts were analysed thematically using NVivo. A hermeneutic framework was used to analyse the deliberation transcripts. Findings – Five interrelated themes were revealed, each reflecting the tools online juries used to communicate, create meaning, and arrive at a verdict. Electronic jury deliberation promoted an understanding of how people make sense of child sexual assault cases in Australia today. Originality/value – This study advanced the understanding of online decision making in a child sexual assault scenario. It demonstrated that knowledge of how juries deliberate and create meaning could improve our understanding of how verdicts are achieved. Electronic mock juries are a valuable adjunct to traditional jury deliberation studies because they are cost effective, time efficient, and offer wider recruitment opportunities. Notes Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner. Language eng DOI 10.1108/14439881311314667 Field of Research 170202 Decision Making Socio Economic Objective 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30052709 Document type: Journal Article Collections: School of Psychology Higher Education Research Group Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Connect to published version (restricted access) Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Tue, 28 May 2013, 14:29:46 EST Wed, 29 May 2013, 08:39:02 EST Wed, 29 May 2013, 14:58:48 EST Wed, 29 May 2013, 15:05:19 EST Wed, 29 May 2013, 15:06:25 EST Thu, 30 May 2013, 08:56:06 EST Fri, 22 Aug 2014, 15:59:50 EST Wed, 27 Aug 2014, 23:30:56 EST Tue, 03 Feb 2015, 13:29:01 EST Sat, 02 Dec 2017, 01:35:31 EST Tue, 05 Dec 2017, 12:40:48 EST Fri, 07 Sep 2018, 16:30:52 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science Cited 2 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 315 Abstract Views, 302 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Tue, 28 May 2013, 14:29:35 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.