Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot : a biomechanical study

Bonacci, Jason, Saunders, Philo U., Hicks, Amy, Rantalainen, Timo, Vicenzino, Bill (Guglielmo) T. and Spratford, Wayne 2013, Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot : a biomechanical study, British journal of sports medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 387-392.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot : a biomechanical study
Author(s) Bonacci, Jason
Saunders, Philo U.
Hicks, Amy
Rantalainen, Timo
Vicenzino, Bill (Guglielmo) T.
Spratford, Wayne
Journal name British journal of sports medicine
Volume number 47
Issue number 6
Start page 387
End page 392
Total pages 6
Publisher BMJ Group
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2013-04
ISSN 0306-3674
1473-0480
Keyword(s) running mechanics
highly trained runners
barefoot
minimalist shoe
overground running
performance implications
Summary Aim The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in running mechanics that occur when highly trained runners run barefoot and in a minimalist shoe, and specifically if running in a minimalist shoe replicates barefoot running.

Methods Ground reaction force data and kinematics were collected from 22 highly trained runners during overground running while barefoot and in three shod conditions (minimalist shoe, racing flat and the athlete's regular shoe). Three-dimensional net joint moments and subsequent net powers and work were computed using Newton-Euler inverse dynamics. Joint kinematic and kinetic variables were statistically compared between barefoot and shod conditions using a multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures and standardised mean differences calculated.

Results There were significant differences between barefoot and shod conditions for kinematic and kinetic variables at the knee and ankle, with no differences between shod conditions. Barefoot running demonstrated less knee flexion during midstance, an 11% decrease in the peak internal knee extension and abduction moments and a 24% decrease in negative work done at the knee compared with shod conditions. The ankle demonstrated less dorsiflexion at initial contact, a 14% increase in peak power generation and a 19% increase in the positive work done during barefoot running compared with shod conditions.

Conclusions Barefoot running was different to all shod conditions. Barefoot running changes the amount of work done at the knee and ankle joints and this may have therapeutic and performance implications for runners.
Language eng
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30052803

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 24 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 26 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 53 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 04 Jun 2013, 11:01:33 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.