The mutual cultivation of subject and object in architecture

Lozanovska, Mirjana 2013, The mutual cultivation of subject and object in architecture, in Cultural ecology : new approaches to culture, architecture and ecology, School of Architecture + Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., pp. 74-81.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The mutual cultivation of subject and object in architecture
Author(s) Lozanovska, Mirjana
Conference name Cultural Ecology. Symposium (2012 : Geelong, Victoria)
Conference location Geelong, Victoria
Conference dates 23-24 Oct. 2012
Title of proceedings Cultural ecology : new approaches to culture, architecture and ecology
Editor(s) Lozanovska, Mirjana
Publication date 2013
Conference series Cultural Ecology Symposium
Start page 74
End page 81
Total pages 8
Publisher School of Architecture + Built Environment, Deakin University
Place of publication Geelong, Vic.
Keyword(s) Hejduk
subject and object
migrant house
everyday
cultivation
Summary The relationship of the migrant figure and the house has been explored in previous research on the migrant house. In addition, the relationship between the migrant house and 1ts perception and representation within the local and national communities within the immigrant-receiving city has been analyzed. The approach and theoretical frameworks for this research involved an understanding of the relationship between the human subject and the object of architecture. Given that much poststructuralist theory has attended to the rethinking of human subjectivity and to rethinking the humanbody, traditional conceptualizations of the relationship between human subject and Object m architecture also need to be re-examined. This paper thus presents an exammatlon of one approach to this relationship, focusing on the exploratory and creative work of the late John Hejduk. Hejduk's Vladivostok presents an assembly of figure-objects that together are a literary metaphor for both society and the city. The paper Will argue that the human subject is imagined within an already ordered architectural sett1ng, and that the human subject cannot be thought prior to and outside the stage of architecture. Rather than searching for a causal or determining relat1onsh1p between subject and object this conceptual underpinning between the subject and object asks for an understanding of the dynamic and animated cultivation between them. In examining Hejduk's entry on the 'subjecUobject' in Vladivostok, the paper Will present an account of the mutual responsiveness that arises between human beings and architecture. It will argue that culture and subjectivity is internal rather than external or marginal to architecture.
Language eng
Field of Research 120103 Architectural History and Theory
120502 History and Theory of the Built Environment (excl Architecture)
Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30053598

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 80 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 12 Jul 2013, 15:24:08 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.