You are not logged in.

Injecting content into the mirage that is proportionality in sentencing

Bagaric, Mirko 2013, Injecting content into the mirage that is proportionality in sentencing, New Zealand universities law review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 411-441.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Injecting content into the mirage that is proportionality in sentencing
Author(s) Bagaric, Mirko
Journal name New Zealand universities law review
Volume number 25
Issue number 3
Start page 411
End page 441
Total pages 32
Publisher Thomson Reuters
Place of publication Wellington, N. Z.
Publication date 2013-06
ISSN 0549-0618
Keyword(s) juvenile delinquents
correctional facility operation services
adulthood
home detention
young adults
change
facilities support services
Summary Sentencing involves the deliberate infliction of harm by society on individuals. It is the most coercive means through which the community imposes its collective (albeit civilised) displeasure at harmful conduct. It is an important and complex process, which involves balancing fundamental interests of victims and the community on the one hand and offenders on the other. The single most important determinant in setting criminal sanctions is the principle of proportionality, which provides that the harshness of the penalty should match the seriousness of the offence. The principle is intuitively appealing but in reality is an illusion, and hence the reason why penalties for criminal offences vary enormously within and across jurisdictions. The main reason is because there is no agreement regarding the considerations that inform offence severity or sanction hardship. This article injects content into the proportionality principle by suggesting that both limbs of the principle should be informed by the extent to which the crime and the sanction set back the well-being of victims and offenders, respectively. These interests are not conclusively mapped. However, a methodology is set out for establishing these interests. This will lead to greater consistency in sentencing and provide a sounder, normative foundation for the manner in which society deals with criminals.
Language eng
Field of Research 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
Socio Economic Objective 940405 Law Reform
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30053703

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 639 Abstract Views, 7 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 17 Jul 2013, 12:00:45 EST by Aysun Alpyurek

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.