Observer effects occur when estimating alert but not flight-initiation distances

Guay, P.J., McLeod, E.M., Cross, R., Formby, A.J., Maldonado, S.P., Stafford-Bell, R.E., St-James-Turner, Z.N., Robinson, R.W., Mulder, R.A. and Weston, M.A. 2013, Observer effects occur when estimating alert but not flight-initiation distances, Wildlife research, vol. 40, pp. 289-293.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Observer effects occur when estimating alert but not flight-initiation distances
Author(s) Guay, P.J.
McLeod, E.M.
Cross, R.
Formby, A.J.
Maldonado, S.P.
Stafford-Bell, R.E.
St-James-Turner, Z.N.
Robinson, R.W.
Mulder, R.A.
Weston, M.A.
Journal name Wildlife research
Volume number 40
Start page 289
End page 293
Total pages 5
Publisher CSIRO Publishing
Place of publication Melbourne, Vic.
Publication date 2013
ISSN 1035-3712
1448-5494
Keyword(s) disturbance
FID
flush
pedestrian
vigilance
walker
waterfowl
wetland
Summary Context: The estimation of alert (vigilance) and flight-initiation (escape) distances (AD and FID, respectively) has underpinned theoretical and applied studies of the escape behaviour and management of disturbance to wildlife. Many studies use multiple observers, and some conduct meta-analyses, these efforts assume no observer effects in the estimation of these distances. Aims and methods: We compared the estimates of FID and AD under ideal conditions (i.e. of black swans, Cygnus atratus, a large species with obvious behaviour, and at a location where swans allowed close approaches in open habitats), by one experienced and four inexperienced observers. Key results: FID did not differ among observers but AD differed between the experienced and all inexperienced observers, and among inexperienced observers. Thus, FID estimates appear more repeatable than those of AD. Experience apparently results in more conservative estimates of AD. Conclusions: FID represents a repeatable measure that is consistent across observers. This study supports its broad application in the study of wildlife escape behaviour. Implications: We recommend the use of FID rather than AD for comparative analyses that involve multiple observers, because FID is more reliably measured.
Language eng
Field of Research 060201 Behavioural Ecology
Socio Economic Objective 960807 Fresh, Ground and Surface Water Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30055253

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 24 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 27 Aug 2013, 11:46:29 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.