Homicide, self-defence and the (inchoate) criminology of battered women

McMahon, Marilyn 2013, Homicide, self-defence and the (inchoate) criminology of battered women, Criminal law journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 79-98.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Homicide, self-defence and the (inchoate) criminology of battered women
Author(s) McMahon, MarilynORCID iD for McMahon, Marilyn orcid.org/0000-0002-5822-3173
Journal name Criminal law journal
Volume number 37
Issue number 2
Start page 79
End page 98
Total pages 20
Publisher Lawbook Co.
Place of publication Rozelle, NSW
Publication date 2013
ISSN 0314-1160
Summary Law reform is increasingly underpinned by empirical research. This is clearly evident in contemporary reform of the laws of self-defence and homicide. These reforms have been motivated largely by concern for battered women who kill their abusive partners. An extensive body of empirical criminological research has been utilised to identify bias in the operation of the traditional law of homicide and self-defence and has been relied upon by many law reform bodies. This article identifies and evaluates the "implicit criminology" constituted by these empirical studies. Five matters that have formed the backdrop to contemporary reform are investigated: the origins of the law of murder; the operation of the law of self-defence; the historical utilisation of mental state defences by battered women; the circumstances in which battered women kill their abusers; and the trial as a key location for processing these offenders. It is argued that the implicit criminology that has driven reform of the law of homicide and self-defence is largely undeveloped or unsubstantiated. Despite the centrality of concern for battered defendants in much contemporary discussion in criminology and the criminal law, it appears that there is still substantial research to be done to clarify the circumstances in which victims of chronic violence kill their abusive partners, how these defendants experience the law and the availability of self-defence to them. What seems to have been established may be more complex, contingent and inchoate than previously acknowledged.
Language eng
Field of Research 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
Socio Economic Objective 940403 Criminal Justice
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©203, Thomson Reuters
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30059001

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 523 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 16 Dec 2013, 11:43:26 EST by Katrina Fleming

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.