Key stakeholder views of venue lockouts in Newcastle and Geelong

Miller, Peter, Palmer, Darren, McFarlane, Emma and Curtis, Ashlee 2014, Key stakeholder views of venue lockouts in Newcastle and Geelong, Crime prevention and community safety, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 38-53, doi: 10.1057/cpcs.2013.12.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Key stakeholder views of venue lockouts in Newcastle and Geelong
Author(s) Miller, PeterORCID iD for Miller, Peter
Palmer, DarrenORCID iD for Palmer, Darren
McFarlane, Emma
Curtis, AshleeORCID iD for Curtis, Ashlee
Journal name Crime prevention and community safety
Volume number 16
Issue number 1
Start page 38
End page 53
Total pages 16
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Place of publication Basingstoke, England
Publication date 2014
ISSN 1460-3780
Keyword(s) alcohol
licensed venues
trading hours restrictions
Summary A substantial proportion of the problems associated with alcohol and interpersonal violence arise in or around licensed premises. One intervention, called lockouts, involves stopping people entering venues at an allocated time (for example, 1:30 am), although the venue can continue to sell alcohol until a specified closing time (for example, 3:30 am). 

The current study examines perceptions of the effectiveness of lockouts as a means of controlling violence in and around licensed premises. This article focuses on the views of key stakeholders drawn from industry, policing agencies and other key stakeholders using in-depth qualitative interviews (n=97) in two Australian regional cities. 

The data was analysed using thematic analysis. While a majority of interviewees believed lockouts were ineffective, thematic analysis highlighted six additional areas of consideration: the reasons for implementing lockouts; the impact on police resources; the benefits in changing patron behaviour; the limits to lockouts; the need for jurisdictional and/or market consistency; and the unintended consequences arising from the use of lockouts.

Two additional findings raise important crime prevention and community safety policy considerations. First, lockouts favoured large venues that closed late rather than smaller, earlier closing venues. Second, concerns were raised about the potential for a lockout to cause an increase in alcohol-related harm by channelling patrons to larger, later closing venues and/or increasing the number of late-night trading venues by creating conditions that forced smaller venues to close or trade later in order to remain viable business.

The article concludes by suggesting that crime prevention and community safety policy development needs to consider the potential harms that might arise from well intentioned but hasty desires to ‘do something now’.
Language eng
DOI 10.1057/cpcs.2013.12
Field of Research 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2014, Palgrave Macmillan
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1198 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 03 Apr 2014, 14:18:14 EST by Jane Moschetti

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact