PhD crisis discourse: a critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’

Cuthbert, Denise and Molla, Tebeje 2015, PhD crisis discourse: a critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’, Higher education, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 33-53, doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title PhD crisis discourse: a critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’
Author(s) Cuthbert, Denise
Molla, Tebeje
Journal name Higher education
Volume number 69
Issue number 1
Start page 33
End page 53
Total pages 21
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-01-01
ISSN 0018-1560
Keyword(s) PhD
crisis discourse
higher education policy
employability
transferable skills
Summary A feature of HE reform discourse is the tendency to construct the rationale for reform in terms of averting calamity and risk. We refer to this risk talk as ‘crisis discourse’. This study examines the formulation of PhD crisis discourse internationally and in Australia. We find that a key feature of PhD crisis discourse is that universities are producing too many graduates for too few academic jobs; and graduates lack skills that enable them to be productive in jobs outside academia. In Australia, the discourse has shifted from one dominated by efficiency concerns from the late 1990s to the present focus on graduate skills and employability. The policy solution to the efficiency crisis in the Australian PhD resulted in system-wide changes in research training funding focused on increased efficiency. The current unemployability discourse has as yet prompted isolated institutional responses, the introduction of new PhD programs or re-badging existing offerings as pro-skills development offerings. Following an examination of three Australian institutional responses, we conclude that the crisis discourse signals tensions surrounding the PhD: should achievement in doctoral education be measured by outcomes in intellectual excellence or the responsiveness of qualification to the current needs and priorities of society?
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y
Field of Research 130103 Higher Education
Socio Economic Objective 930501 Education and Training Systems Policies and Development
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2014, Springer
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30062690

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 25 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 27 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 253 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 28 Apr 2014, 12:27:50 EST by Tebeje Mekonnen

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.