You are not logged in.

Assessing and intervening on OSH programmes : effectiveness evaluation of the Wellworks-2 intervention in 15 manufacturing worksites

LaMontagne, A.D., Barbeau, E., Youngstrom, R.A., Lewiton, M., Stoddard, A.M., McLellan, D., Wallace, L.M. and Sorensen, G. 2004, Assessing and intervening on OSH programmes : effectiveness evaluation of the Wellworks-2 intervention in 15 manufacturing worksites, Occupational & environmental medicine, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 651-660, doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.011718.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing and intervening on OSH programmes : effectiveness evaluation of the Wellworks-2 intervention in 15 manufacturing worksites
Author(s) LaMontagne, A.D.ORCID iD for LaMontagne, A.D. orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-5906
Barbeau, E.
Youngstrom, R.A.
Lewiton, M.
Stoddard, A.M.
McLellan, D.
Wallace, L.M.
Sorensen, G.
Journal name Occupational & environmental medicine
Volume number 61
Issue number 8
Start page 651
End page 660
Total pages 10
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2004
ISSN 1470-7926
Keyword(s) occupational health
program evaluation
consumer participation
hazardous substances
health education
humans
industry
occupational health services
preventative health services
risk assessment
united states
workplace
Summary To develop a transparent and broadly applicable method for assessing occupational safety and health (OSH) programmes or management systems; (2) to assess OSH programmes in a sample of manufacturing worksites; and (3) to determine whether a management focused occupational health intervention results in greater improvement in OSH programmes compared to minimal intervention controls. OSH programmes were assessed using an adaptation of the US Occupational Safety & Health Administration's 1995 Program Evaluation Profile. Scores were generated from 91 binary indicator variables grouped under four "Essential Elements". Essential Element scores were weighted to contribute to an overall programme score on a 100 point scale. Seventeen large manufacturing worksites were assessed at baseline; 15 sites completed the 16 month intervention and follow up assessments. There was considerable variation in Essential Element scores across sites at baseline as judged by our instrument, particularly in "management commitment and employee participation" and "workplace analysis". Most sites scored highly on "hazard prevention and control" and "training and education". For overall OSH programme scores, most sites scored in the 60-80% range at baseline, with four sites scoring below 60%, suggesting weak programmes. Intervention sites showed greater improvements than controls in the four programme elements and in overall programme scores, with significantly greater improvements in "management commitment and employee participation". The OSH programme assessment method used is broadly applicable to manufacturing work settings, and baseline profiles suggest needs for improvement in OSH programmes in most such worksites. Despite a small sample size, results showed that sustained management focused intervention can result in improvement in these OSH programme measures.
Language eng
DOI 10.1136/oem.2003.011718
Field of Research 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30065751

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 55 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 225 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 16 Sep 2014, 14:17:35 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.