You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

Planning education and indigenous knowledge systems in Australia: where are we?

Jones, David, Low Choy, Darryl, Revell, Grant, Heyes, Scott, Tucker, Richard, Meikle, Helen and Davey, Cate 2013, Planning education and indigenous knowledge systems in Australia: where are we?, in ANZAPS 2013 : Innovation in planning for cities and regions : proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Association of Planning Schools Conference, Canberra Urban and Regional Futures, Canberra, A.C.T., pp. 43-66.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
tucker-planningeducation-2013.pdf Published version application/pdf 389.97KB 169

Title Planning education and indigenous knowledge systems in Australia: where are we?
Author(s) Jones, David
Low Choy, Darryl
Revell, Grant
Heyes, Scott
Tucker, RichardORCID iD for Tucker, Richard orcid.org/0000-0001-9989-251X
Meikle, Helen
Davey, Cate
Conference name Australian & New Zealand Association of Planning Schools. Conference (2013 : Canberra, A.C.T.)
Conference location Canberra, A.C.T.
Conference dates 27-29 Sep 2013
Title of proceedings ANZAPS 2013 : Innovation in planning for cities and regions : proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Association of Planning Schools Conference
Editor(s) Norman, B.
Sinclair, H.
Publication date 2013
Start page 43
End page 66
Total pages 24
Publisher Canberra Urban and Regional Futures
Place of publication Canberra, A.C.T.
Keyword(s) Planning education
Indigenous knowledge systems
Planning Institute of Australia
Summary In 2008 Sarah Oberklaid reviewed the state of Indigenous knowledge systems in the Planning Institute of Australia (PIA)-accredited University planning programs and found a fragmented unfocused suite of agendas and attempts at addressing this increasingly important moral, cultural and land use management issue. While Oberklaid statistically validated what several authors have observed, and continue to observe, there appears to have been little action by programs, and specifically the PIA (Planning Institute of Australia), to address this issue and reposition their education accreditation policies; with the latter increasingly reluctant to engage with their professional responsibilities. This paper appraises this situation and foreshadows continuing research that may better inform and support a change of perspective by the PIA andthese programs.
ISBN 9781740883948
Language eng
Field of Research 120501 Community Planning
120199 Architecture not elsewhere classified
130103 Higher Education
Socio Economic Objective 930301 Assessment and Evaluation of Curriculum
HERDC Research category E1.1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©2013, University of Canberra
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30069904

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: School of Architecture and Built Environment
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 153 Abstract Views, 171 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 04 Mar 2015, 14:11:45 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.