Protected species use of a coastal marine migratory corridor connecting marine protected areas

Pendoley, Kellie L, Schofield, Gail, Whittock, Paul A, Ierodiaconou, Daniel and Hays, Graeme C 2014, Protected species use of a coastal marine migratory corridor connecting marine protected areas, Marine Biology, vol. 161, no. 6, pp. 1455-1466, doi: 10.1007/s00227-014-2433-7.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Protected species use of a coastal marine migratory corridor connecting marine protected areas
Author(s) Pendoley, Kellie L
Schofield, GailORCID iD for Schofield, Gail
Whittock, Paul A
Ierodiaconou, DanielORCID iD for Ierodiaconou, Daniel
Hays, Graeme CORCID iD for Hays, Graeme C
Journal name Marine Biology
Volume number 161
Issue number 6
Start page 1455
End page 1466
Total pages 12
Publisher Springer Verlag
Place of publication Heidelberg , Germany
Publication date 2014-04-26
ISSN 0025-3162
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Summary The establishment of protected corridors linking the breeding and foraging grounds of many migratory species remains deficient, particularly in the world's oceans. For example, Australia has recently established a network of Commonwealth Marine Reserves, supplementing existing State reserves, to protect a wide range of resident and migratory marine species; however, the routes used by mobile species to access these sites are often unknown. The flatback marine turtle (Natator depressus) is endemic to the continental shelf of Australia, yet information is not available about how this species uses the marine area. We used a geospatial approach to delineate a coastal corridor from 73 adult female flatback postnesting migratory tracks from four rookeries along the north-west coast of Australia. A core corridor of 1,150 km length and 30,800 km2 area was defined, of which 52 % fell within 11 reserves, leaving 48 % (of equivalent size to several Commonwealth Reserves) of the corridor outside of the reserve network. Despite limited data being available for other marine wildlife in this region, humpback whale migratory tracks overlapped with 96 % of the core corridor, while the tracks of three other species overlapped by 5-10 % (blue whales, olive ridley turtles, whale sharks). The overlap in the distribution ranges of at least 20 other marine vertebrates (dugong, cetaceans, marine turtles, sea snakes, crocodiles, sharks) with the corridor also imply potential use. In conclusion, this study provides valuable information towards proposing new locations requiring protection, as well as identifying high-priority network linkages between existing marine protected areas. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s00227-014-2433-7
Field of Research 060299 Ecology not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 960808 Marine Flora
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2014, Springer Verlag
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 70 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 68 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 694 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 05 Mar 2015, 14:09:19 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact