You are not logged in.

Proportionality in sentencing: the need to factor in community experience, not public opinion

Bagaric,M 2014, Proportionality in sentencing: the need to factor in community experience, not public opinion. In Ryberg,J and Roberts,JV (ed), Popular punishment on the normative significance of public opinion, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, pp.76-100.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Proportionality in sentencing: the need to factor in community experience, not public opinion
Author(s) Bagaric,M
Title of book Popular punishment on the normative significance of public opinion
Editor(s) Ryberg,J
Roberts,JV
Publication date 2014
Chapter number 4
Total chapters 11
Start page 76
End page 100
Total pages 272
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of Publication Oxford, England
Summary This is the first book to address the question of what role public opinion should play in the way criminal offenders are punished.Should public opinion determine—or even influence—sentencing policy and practice? Should the punishment of criminal offenders reflect what the public regards as appropriate? These deceptively simple questions conceal complex theoretical and methodological challenges to the administration of punishment.In the West, politicians have often answered these questions in the affirmative; penal reforms have been justified with direct reference to the attitudes of the public. This is why the contention that politicians should bridge the gap between the public and criminal justice practice has widespread resonance. Criminal law scholars, for their part, have often been more reluctant to accept public input in penal practice, and some have even held that the idea of consulting public opinion constitutes a populist approach to punishment.The purpose of this book is to examine the moral significance of public opinion for penal theory and practice. For the first time in a single volume the editors, Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts, have assembled a number of respected criminologists, philosphers, and legal theorists to address the various aspects of why and how public opinion should be reflected in the way the criminal justice system deals with criminals. The chapters address the myriad complexities surrounding this issue by first weighing the justifications for incorporating public views into punishment practices and then considering the various ways this might be achieved through juries, prosecutors, restoratifve justice programs, and other means.
ISBN 9780199941377
Language eng
Field of Research 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
Socio Economic Objective 940405 Law Reform
HERDC Research category B1 Book chapter
ERA Research output type B Book chapter
Copyright notice ©2014, Oxford University Press
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30070603

Document type: Book Chapter
Collection: Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 294 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 12 Mar 2015, 10:16:41 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.