Differences between subjective and objective assessments of the utility of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with bipolar and unipolar depression

Hallam, KT, Smith, DI and Berk, Michael 2009, Differences between subjective and objective assessments of the utility of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with bipolar and unipolar depression, Journal of affective disorders, vol. 112, no. 1-3, pp. 212-218, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.024.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Differences between subjective and objective assessments of the utility of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with bipolar and unipolar depression
Author(s) Hallam, KT
Smith, DI
Berk, MichaelORCID iD for Berk, Michael orcid.org/0000-0002-5554-6946
Journal name Journal of affective disorders
Volume number 112
Issue number 1-3
Start page 212
End page 218
Total pages 7
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2009-01
ISSN 0165-0327
Keyword(s) Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Health
Bipolar Disorder
Clinician rated
Depression
Depressive Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Female
Health Status
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcomes
Personality Inventory
Predictive Value of Tests
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatry
Quality of Life
Self-report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Victoria
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.024
Field of Research 11 Medical And Health Sciences
17 Psychology And Cognitive Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2008, Elsevier B.V.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30071374

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 24 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 24 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 58 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 18 Mar 2015, 10:46:32 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.