Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation

Whitehead,AL, Kujala,H, Ives,CD, Gordon,A, Lentini,PE, Wintle,BA, Nicholson,E and Raymond,CM 2014, Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation, Conservation biology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 992-1003, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12257.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation
Author(s) Whitehead,AL
Nicholson,EORCID iD for Nicholson,E
Journal name Conservation biology
Volume number 28
Issue number 4
Start page 992
End page 1003
Total pages 12
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2014-08
ISSN 1523-1739
Keyword(s) Biodiversidad
conservation planning
development preferences
participación pública
planeación de la conservación
preferencias de desarrollo
priorización espacial
public participation GIS
social values
spatial prioritization
valores sociales
Summary The consideration of information on social values in conjunction with biological data is critical for achieving both socially acceptable and scientifically defensible conservation planning outcomes. However, the influence of social values on spatial conservation priorities has received limited attention and is poorly understood. We present an approach that incorporates quantitative data on social values for conservation and social preferences for development into spatial conservation planning. We undertook a public participation GIS survey to spatially represent social values and development preferences and used species distribution models for 7 threatened fauna species to represent biological values. These spatially explicit data were simultaneously included in the conservation planning software Zonation to examine how conservation priorities changed with the inclusion of social data. Integrating spatially explicit information about social values and development preferences with biological data produced prioritizations that differed spatially from the solution based on only biological data. However, the integrated solutions protected a similar proportion of the species' distributions, indicating that Zonation effectively combined the biological and social data to produce socially feasible conservation solutions of approximately equivalent biological value. We were able to identify areas of the landscape where synergies and conflicts between different value sets are likely to occur. Identification of these synergies and conflicts will allow decision makers to target communication strategies to specific areas and ensure effective community engagement and positive conservation outcomes.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12257
Field of Research 060208 Terrestrial Ecology
050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
Socio Economic Objective 960805 Flora
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2014, Wileyl
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 67 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 67 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 441 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 04 May 2015, 12:44:59 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact