You are not logged in.

Type D personality and the Five-Factor Model : a facet-level analysis

Horwood, Sharon, Anglim, Jeromy and Tooley, Greg 2015, Type D personality and the Five-Factor Model : a facet-level analysis, Personality and individual differences, vol. 83, pp. 50-54, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.041.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Type D personality and the Five-Factor Model : a facet-level analysis
Author(s) Horwood, SharonORCID iD for Horwood, Sharon orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-643X
Anglim, JeromyORCID iD for Anglim, Jeromy orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-9315
Tooley, GregORCID iD for Tooley, Greg orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3285
Journal name Personality and individual differences
Volume number 83
Start page 50
End page 54
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-09
ISSN 0191-8869
1873-3549
Keyword(s) Type D
personality
Big 5
facets
Five Factor Model
Summary Objective: This study assessed the degree to which NEO-PI-R facets contribute to understanding of Type D personality over and above the Big 5. Method: Healthy participants (n = 268) completed the DS14 and the NEO-PI-R. In addition to analyzing the Type D subscales of social inhibition and negative affectivity, we computed a continuous measure of Type D scored as the sum of the two subscales. Results: Facets provided moderate incremental prediction of Type D subscales. The facets of assertiveness, self- consciousness, and positive emotion provided incremental prediction of negative affectivity, and warmth, activity, and gregariousness provided incremental prediction of social inhibition. Facets provided minimal incremental prediction of continuous Type D. The Big 5 explained substantially more variance in continuous Type D (71%) than negative affectivity (59%) or social inhibition (61%). Conclusions: Overall, the facet-level analysis provided additional insights into the nature of Type D. The incremental prediction of the Type D subscales by facets supported the idea that Type D scales are narrower constructs than the Big 5. However, the strong prediction of continuous Type D by the Big 5 and the lack of incremental prediction by facets points to the overall Type D construct being well represented by the Big 5.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.041
Field of Research 170110 Psychological Methodology, Design and Analysis
Socio Economic Objective 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30072153

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 227 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 09 Apr 2015, 17:34:33 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.