Systematic review and quality appraisal of economic evaluation publications in dentistry

Tonmukayakul, Utsana, Calache, Hanny, Clark, Richard, Wasiak, Jason and Faggion, Clovis M. 2015, Systematic review and quality appraisal of economic evaluation publications in dentistry, Journal of dental research, vol. In press, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1177/0022034515589958.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Systematic review and quality appraisal of economic evaluation publications in dentistry
Author(s) Tonmukayakul, UtsanaORCID iD for Tonmukayakul, Utsana orcid.org/0000-0002-6464-744X
Calache, Hanny
Clark, Richard
Wasiak, Jason
Faggion, Clovis M.
Journal name Journal of dental research
Volume number In press
Start page 1
End page 7
Total pages 7
Publisher SAGE Publications
Place of publication Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Publication date 2015
ISSN 1544-0591
Keyword(s) cost-effectiveness analysis
critical appraisal
dental economics
evidence-based dentistry
literature review
oral health
Summary Economic evaluation (EE) studies have been undertaken in dentistry since the late 20th century because economic data provide additional information to policy makers to develop guidelines and set future direction for oral health services. The objectives of this study were to assess the methodological quality of EEs in oral health. Electronic searching of Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database from 1975 to 2013 were undertaken to identify publications that include costs and outcomes in dentistry. Relevant reference lists were also searched for additional studies. Studies were retrieved and reviewed independently for inclusion by 3 authors. Furthermore, to appraise the EE methods, 1 author applied the Drummond 10-item (13-criteria) checklist tool to each study. Of the 114 publications identified, 79 studies were considered full EE and 35 partial. Twenty-eight studies (30%) were published between the years 2011 and 2013. Sixty-four (53%) studies focused on dental caries prevention or treatment. Median appraisal scores calculated for full and partial EE studies were 11 and 9 out of 13, respectively. Quality assessment scores showed that the quality of partial EE studies published after 2000 significantly improved (P = 0.02) compared to those published before 2000. Significant quality improvement was not found in full EE studies. Common methodological limitations were identified: absence of sensitivity analysis, discounting, and insufficient information on how costs and outcomes were measured and valued. EE studies in dentistry increased over the last 40 y in both quantity and quality, but a number of publications failed to satisfy some components of standard EE research methods, such as sensitivity analysis and discounting.
Language eng
DOI 10.1177/0022034515589958
Field of Research 140208 Health Economics
Socio Economic Objective 920113 Oro-Dental Disorders
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, Sage Publications
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30074103

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Population Health
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 10 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 263 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 01 Jul 2015, 12:32:59 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.