'Unconscionable mystification'? : rooms, spaces and the prose poem

Hetherington, Paul and Atherton, Cassandra 2015, 'Unconscionable mystification'? : rooms, spaces and the prose poem, New writing : the international journal for the practice and theory of creative writing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 265-281, doi: 10.1080/14790726.2015.1047856.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title 'Unconscionable mystification'? : rooms, spaces and the prose poem
Author(s) Hetherington, Paul
Atherton, CassandraORCID iD for Atherton, Cassandra orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-8566
Journal name New writing : the international journal for the practice and theory of creative writing
Volume number 12
Issue number 3
Start page 265
End page 281
Total pages 17
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2015
ISSN 1943-3107
Keyword(s) prose poetry
genre
poetic
rooms
spaces
creative practice
Summary Since the 19th century, when a number of French writers—most conspicuously Charles Baudelaire and Arthur Rimbaud—introduced what we may think of as the modern prose poem into European literature, prose poetry has been part of a significant debate about the contemporary usefulness of existing literary modes and genres. While early French practitioners partly used the form to subvert and problematise traditional poetic prosody, once this aim was achieved prose poetry remained a significant contemporary literary form, achieving wide acceptance. In the context of contemporary developments and manifestations of prose poetry, this article discusses John Frow’s comments that texts might “‘perform’ a genre, or modify it in ‘using’ it, or only partially realise a generic form, or … be composed of a mix of different genres” (2015: 11). It also discusses the authors’ Rooms and Spaces project, which explores—and exemplifies through its component of creative practice—ways in which prose poetry may be considered “poetic”; how the forms of prose poetry may be room-like and condensed; or open and highly suggestive (sometimes both at once); how prose poetry is intertextual and polysemous; and how prose poetry frequently conveys a sense of completeness despite tending to be fragmentary. Prose poetry may generically problematic but the authors suggest that this may make it an exemplary post-postmodern form of writing; and that reading prose poetry may provide significant insights into understanding how unstable genre boundaries really are.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/14790726.2015.1047856
Field of Research 200502 Australian Literature (excl Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Literature)
Socio Economic Objective 970119 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of the Creative Arts and Writing
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, Taylor & Francis
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30074367

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 358 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 14 Jul 2015, 22:28:22 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.