Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: ignore time-related change at your peril

Biro, Peter A. and Stamps, Judy A. 2015, Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: ignore time-related change at your peril, Animal behaviour, vol. 105, pp. 223-230, doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.008.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: ignore time-related change at your peril
Author(s) Biro, Peter A.ORCID iD for Biro, Peter A. orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-240X
Stamps, Judy A.
Journal name Animal behaviour
Volume number 105
Start page 223
End page 230
Total pages 8
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-07-01
ISSN 0003-3472
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Behavioral Sciences
Zoology
behavioural syndromes
metabolism
mixed models
personality
plasticity
INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
PERSONALITY-DEVELOPMENT
ANIMAL PERSONALITY
METABOLIC-RATE
REACTION NORMS
STICKLEBACKS
METAANALYSIS
HABITUATION
GROWTH
Summary © 2015 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Broad sense repeatability, which refers to the extent to which individual differences in trait scores are maintained over time, is of increasing interest to researchers studying behavioural or physiological traits. Broad sense repeatability is most often inferred from the statistic R (the intraclass correlation, or narrow sense repeatability). However, R ignores change over time, despite the inherent longitudinal nature of the data (repeated measures over time). Here, we begin by showing that most studies ignore time-related change when estimating broad sense repeatability, and estimate R with low statistical power. Given this problem, we (1) outline how and why ignoring time-related change in scores (that occurs for whatever reason) can seriously affect estimates of the broad sense repeatability of behavioural or physiological traits, (2) discuss conditions in which various indices of R can or cannot provide reliable estimates of broad sense repeatability, and (3) provide suggestions for experimental designs for future studies. Finally, given that we already have abundant evidence that many labile traits are 'repeatable' in that broad sense (i.e. R>. 0), we suggest a shift in focus towards obtaining robust estimates of the repeatability of behavioural and physiological traits. Given how labile these traits are, this will require greater experimental (and/or statistical) control and larger sample sizes in order to detect and quantify change over time (if present).
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.008
Field of Research 060201 Behavioural Ecology
Socio Economic Objective 969999 Environment not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30074546

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 41 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 44 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 181 Abstract Views, 5 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 12 Nov 2015, 14:30:41 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.