You are not logged in.

Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves?

Janssen, Stein J., Teunis, Teun, Guitton, Thierry G., Ring, David and Page, Richard S. 2015, Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves?, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, vol. 473, no. 11, pp. 3564-3572, doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4304-z.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves?
Author(s) Janssen, Stein J.
Teunis, Teun
Guitton, Thierry G.
Ring, David
Page, Richard S.ORCID iD for Page, Richard S. orcid.org/0000-0002-2225-7144
Journal name Clinical orthopaedics and related research
Volume number 473
Issue number 11
Start page 3564
End page 3572
Total pages 9
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Berlin, Germany
Publication date 2015-11
ISSN 0009-921X
1528-1132
Summary Background - There is substantial unexplained geographical and surgeon-to-surgeon variation in rates of surgery. One would expect surgeons to treat patients and themselves similarly based on best evidence and accounting for patient preferences.

Questions/purposes - (1) Are surgeons more likely to recommend surgery when choosing for a patient than for themselves? (2) Are surgeons less confident in deciding for patients than for themselves?

Methods - Two hundred fifty-four (32%) of 790 Science of Variation Group (SOVG) members reviewed 21 fictional upper extremity cases (eg, distal radius fracture, De Quervain tendinopathy) for which surgery is optional answering two questions: (1) What treatment would you choose/recommend: operative or nonoperative? (2) On a scale from 0 to 10, how confident are you about this decision? Confidence is the degree that one believes that his or her decision is the right one (ie, most appropriate). Participants were orthopaedic, trauma, and plastic surgeons, all with an interest in treating upper extremity conditions. Half of the participants were randomized to choose for themselves if they had this injury or illness. The other half was randomized to make treatment recommendations for a patient of their age and gender. For the choice of operative or nonoperative, the overall recommendation for treatment was expressed as a surgery score per surgeon by dividing the number of cases they would operate on by the total number of cases (n = 21), where 100% is when every surgeon recommended surgery for every case. For confidence, we calculated the mean confidence for all 21 cases per surgeon; overall score ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating more confidence in the decision for treatment.

Results - Surgeons were more likely to recommend surgery for a patient (44.2% ± 14.0%) than they were to choose surgery for themselves (38.5% ± 15.4%) with a mean difference of 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1%–9.4%; p = 0.002). Surgeons were more confident in deciding for themselves than they were for a patient of similar age and gender (self: 7.9 ± 1.0, patient: 7.5 ± 1.2, mean difference: 0.35 [CI, 0.075–0.62], p = 0.012).

Conclusions - Surgeons are slightly more likely to recommend surgery for a patient than they are to choose surgery for themselves and they choose for themselves with a little more confidence. Different perspectives, preferences, circumstantial information, and cognitive biases might explain the observed differences. This emphasizes the importance of (1) understanding patients’ preferences and their considerations for treatment; (2) being aware that surgeons and patients might weigh various factors differently; (3) giving patients more autonomy by letting them balance risks and benefits themselves (ie, shared decision-making); and (4) assessing how dispassionate evidence-based decision aids help inform the patient and influences their decisional conflict.

Level of Evidence - Level III, diagnostic study.
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4304-z
Field of Research 110314 Orthopaedics
111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920116 Skeletal System and Disorders (incl. Arthritis)
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Springer
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30074856

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 157 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 05 Aug 2015, 11:20:11 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.