Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: a critique of procedural justice theory

Harkin, Diarmaid 2015, Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: a critique of procedural justice theory, Criminology and criminal justice, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 594-612, doi: 10.1177/1748895815580397.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: a critique of procedural justice theory
Author(s) Harkin, DiarmaidORCID iD for Harkin, Diarmaid orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-719X
Journal name Criminology and criminal justice
Volume number 15
Issue number 5
Start page 594
End page 612
Total pages 19
Publisher Sage
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2015-11
ISSN 1748-8958
Keyword(s) Social Sciences
Criminology & Penology
police legitimacy
procedural justice
systems-justification theory
Summary I argue that there are unconsidered complexities to police legitimacy and use examples from my study of police–public consultation forums in Edinburgh, Scotland to illustrate. I make a number of conceptual and methodological critiques by drawing upon Steven Lukes’ social theory on power to show how legitimacy can be a product of authority relations as much as it is a cause of authority relations. This view finds support from systems-justification theory. I also tackle Beetham’s conception of legitimacy and argue that there is evidence from police studies that the police breach his key antecedents to legitimacy without incurring the expected consequences. Furthermore, I take an original methodological approach to studying police legitimacy which reveals additional insights. For instance, Bottoms and Tankebe suggest legitimacy addresses multiple ‘audiences’; I would also add that it addresses multiple recipients as legitimacy is shown to vary among officers and positions of rank.
Language eng
DOI 10.1177/1748895815580397
Field of Research 1602 Criminology
160205 Police Administration, Procedures and Practice
Socio Economic Objective 940499 Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Sage
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30075565

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Humanities and Social Sciences
2018 ERA Submission
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 170 Abstract Views, 9 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 12:55:36 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.