You are not logged in.

Implementing the international benchmarking labour productivity theoretical model

Ghoddousi, Parviz, Alizadeh, Behzad T., Hosseini, M. Reza and Chileshe, Nicholas 2014, Implementing the international benchmarking labour productivity theoretical model, Benchmarking, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1041-1061, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2012-0029.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Implementing the international benchmarking labour productivity theoretical model
Author(s) Ghoddousi, Parviz
Alizadeh, Behzad T.
Hosseini, M. RezaORCID iD for Hosseini, M. Reza orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-736X
Chileshe, Nicholas
Journal name Benchmarking
Volume number 21
Issue number 6
Start page 1041
End page 1061
Total pages 22
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing
Place of publication Bingley, Eng.
Publication date 2014
ISSN 1463-5771
Keyword(s) Construction
Iran
Benchmarking
Project performance
Labour productivity
Steel structures
Summary Purpose – Building upon the results of a critical review of previous studies, the purpose of this paper is to present a framework to enhance the reliability of the theoretical model for international benchmarking of labour productivity (TMIBLP) method for construction project activities. The next part of the paper presents the results of implementing the proposed framework for construction activities in the Iranian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach – This paper draws upon a critical review of the literature to highlight the drawbacks of the previous studies concerning implementing TMIBLP within the construction industry. Identifying these shortcomings, the authors propose a framework for construction projects, which presents the procedure for deploying TMIBLP for construction activities in a reliable manner. The final section of the paper demonstrates the empirical implementation of the proposed framework within the Iranian construction industry. Findings – The primary contributions of the paper include: identifying the drawbacks of previous studies within the construction context, the framework that would lead construction managers towards more reliable implementation of benchmarking for construction projects, and determining the baseline of erecting steel structures in a developing country. Practical implications – A practical implementation of the TMIBLP method was presented to address the lack of research in Iran and to show the feasibility of using the framework developed. The authors investigated the daily labour productivity for the activity of structural steel erection for six projects in Tehran in order to determine the values of the baseline productivity for each project. Accordingly, the disruption index, performance ratio and project management index as the project benchmarks were calculated for all six projects. Originality/value – Underlining the necessity of implementing methods such as TMIBLP, this study outlines the outcomes of the first study on the benchmarking of construction activities deploying the proposed framework and using the data on erecting steel structures from six construction projects in Iran. The discussions provide guidelines for construction project managers regarding benchmarking labour productivity. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research opportunities.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/BIJ-04-2012-0029
Field of Research 120201 Building Construction Management and Project Planning
Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2014, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30075623

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Architecture and Built Environment
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 37 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 02 Dec 2016, 10:34:52 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.