You are not logged in.

Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning

Guy, Richard, Pisani, Heather R, Rich, Peter, Leahy, Cathy, Mandarano, Giovanni and Molyneux, Tom 2015, Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning, Anatomical sciences education, vol. 8, no. 2, March - April, pp. 126-132, doi: 10.1002/ase.1461.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning
Author(s) Guy, Richard
Pisani, Heather R
Rich, Peter
Leahy, Cathy
Mandarano, Giovanni
Molyneux, Tom
Journal name Anatomical sciences education
Volume number 8
Issue number 2
Season March - April
Start page 126
End page 132
Total pages 7
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2015-03
ISSN 1935-9780
Keyword(s) blended learning
computer-assisted learning
e-atlas
e-learning
gross anatomy education
self-directed learning
Summary An Interactive electronic Atlas (IeA) was developed to assist first-year nursing students with interpretation of laboratory-based prosected cadaveric material. It was designed, using pedagogically sound principles, as a student-centered resource accessible to students from a wide range of learning backgrounds. It consisted of a highly simplified interactive interface limited to essential anatomical structures and was intended for use in a blended learning situation. The IeA's nine modules mirrored the body systems covered in a Nursing Biosciences course, with each module comprising a maximum of 10 pages using the same template: an image displaying a cadaveric specimen and, in most cases, a corresponding anatomical model with navigation panes (menus) on one side. Cursor movement over the image or clicking the menu highlighted the structure with a transparent overlay and revealed a succinct functional description. The atlas was complemented by a multiple-choice database of nearly 1,000 questions using IeA images. Students' perceptions of usability and utility were measured by survey (n = 115; 57% of the class) revealing mean access of 2.3 times per week during the 12-week semester and a median time of three hours of use. Ratings for usability and utility were high, with means ranging between 4.24 and 4.54 (five-point Likert scale; 5 = strongly agree). Written responses told a similar story for both usability and utility. The role of providing basic computer-assisted learning support for a large first-year class is discussed in the context of current research into student-centered resources and blended learning in human anatomy.
Language eng
DOI 10.1002/ase.1461
Field of Research 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy
1303 Specialist Studies in Education
0606 Physiology
Socio Economic Objective 929999 Health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Wiley
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30076262

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 63 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 20 Oct 2015, 13:48:03 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.