You are not logged in.

The competition between metastable and equilibrium S (Al<inf>2</inf>CuMg) phase during the decomposition of AlCuMg alloys

Styles, M. J., Marceau, Ross K. W., Bastow, T. J., Brand, H. E. A., Gibson, M. A. and Hutchinson, C. R. 2015, The competition between metastable and equilibrium S (Al2CuMg) phase during the decomposition of AlCuMg alloys, Acta materialia, vol. 98, pp. 64-80, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.011.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The competition between metastable and equilibrium S (Al2CuMg) phase during the decomposition of AlCuMg alloys
Author(s) Styles, M. J.
Marceau, Ross K. W.ORCID iD for Marceau, Ross K. W. orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-8762
Bastow, T. J.
Brand, H. E. A.
Gibson, M. A.
Hutchinson, C. R.
Journal name Acta materialia
Volume number 98
Start page 64
End page 80
Total pages 17
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-07-21
ISSN 1359-6454
Keyword(s) AlCuMg
Atom probe tomography
Powder diffraction
Precipitation
Rietveld refinement
S phase
Summary Abstract The decomposition sequence of the supersaturated solid solution leading to the formation of the equilibrium S (Al2CuMg) phase in AlCuMg alloys has long been the subject of ambiguity and debate. Recent high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction experiments have shown that the decomposition sequence does involve a metastable variant of the S phase (denoted S1), which has lattice parameters that are distinctly different to those of the equilibrium S phase (denoted S2). In this paper, the difference between these two phases is resolved using high-resolution synchrotron and neutron powder diffraction and atom probe tomography, and the transformation from S1 to S2 is characterised in detail by in situ synchrotron powder diffraction. The results of these experiments confirm that there are no significant differences between the crystal structures of S1 and S2, however, the powder diffraction and atom probe measurements both indicate that the S1 phase forms with a slight deficiency in Cu. The in situ isothermal aging experiments show that S1 forms rapidly, reaching its maximum concentration in only a few minutes at high temperatures, while complete conversion to the S2 phase can take thousands of hours at low temperature. The kinetics of S phase precipitation have been quantitatively analysed for the first time and it is shown that S1 phase forms with an average activation energy of 75 kJ/mol, which is much lower than the activation energy for Cu and Mg diffusion in an Al matrix (136 kJ/mol and 131 kJ/mol, respectively). The mechanism of the replacement of S1 with the equilibrium S2 phase is discussed.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.011
Field of Research 091207 Metals and Alloy Materials
Socio Economic Objective 970109 Expanding Knowledge in Engineering
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30076271

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Institute for Frontier Materials
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 115 Abstract Views, 5 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 24 Aug 2015, 14:31:05 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.