You are not logged in.

The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review

Braaf, Sandra, Manias, Elizabeth and Riley, Robin 2011, The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review, International journal of nursing studies, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1024-1038, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.009.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The role of documents and documentation in communication failure across the perioperative pathway. A literature review
Author(s) Braaf, Sandra
Manias, ElizabethORCID iD for Manias, Elizabeth orcid.org/0000-0002-3747-0087
Riley, Robin
Journal name International journal of nursing studies
Volume number 48
Issue number 8
Start page 1024
End page 1038
Total pages 15
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2011-08
ISSN 0020-7489
1873-491X
Keyword(s) communication
document
documentation
Humans
perioperative
literature review
record keeping
perioperative care
Summary OBJECTIVE: Communication practices of healthcare professionals have been strongly implicated in the cascade of events that unfold into poor outcomes for surgical patients. The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of documents and documentation in communication failure among healthcare professionals across the perioperative pathway. The perioperative pathway consists of 3 interconnecting, but geographically distinct domains: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. DESIGN: A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken to provide a focused analysis and appraisal of past research. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases searched included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline and PsycINFO from 1990 to end February 2011. Additionally, references of retrieved articles were manually examined for papers not revealed via electronic searches. REVIEW METHODS: Content analysis was used to draw out major themes and summarise the information. RESULTS: Fifty-nine papers were selected based on their relevance to the topic. The results highlight that documentation such as surgeons' operation notes, anaesthetists' records and nurses' perioperative notes, deficient in the areas of design, quality, accuracy and function, contributed to the development of communication failure among healthcare professionals across the perioperative pathway. The consequences of communication failure attributable to documentation ranged from inefficiency, delays and increased workload, through to serious adverse patient events such as wrong site surgery. Documents that involve the coordination of verbal communication of multidisciplinary surgical teams, such as preoperative checklists, also influenced communication and surgical patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication among healthcare professionals is vital to the delivery of safe patient care. Multiple documents utilised across the perioperative pathway have a critical role in the communication of information essential to the immediate and ongoing care of surgical patients. Failure in the communicative function of documents and documentation impedes the transfer of information and contributes to the cascade of events that results in compromised patient safety and potentially adverse patient outcomes.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.009
Field of Research 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
1110 Nursing
Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2011, Crown Copyright
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30076309

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Nursing and Midwifery
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 12 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 17 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 18 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 24 Aug 2015, 13:51:25 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.