You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

2nd generation concrete construction: carbon footprint accounting

Collins, Frank 2013, 2nd generation concrete construction: carbon footprint accounting, Engineering, construction and architectural management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 330-344, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2010-0072.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
collins-2ndgenerationconcrete-post-2013.pdf Author's post print application/pdf 563.85KB 41

Title 2nd generation concrete construction: carbon footprint accounting
Author(s) Collins, FrankORCID iD for Collins, Frank orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-5390
Journal name Engineering, construction and architectural management
Volume number 20
Issue number 4
Start page 330
End page 344
Total pages 15
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing
Place of publication Bingley, Eng.
Publication date 2013
ISSN 0969-9988
Keyword(s) Environmental management
Life cycle
Carbon footprint
Construction materials
Recycling
Concretes
Carbon
Carbonation
Summary Purpose – Construction contractors and facility managers are being challenged to minimize the carbon footprint. Life cycle carbon‐equivalent (CO2‐e) accounting, whereby the potential emissions of greenhouse gases due to energy expenditure during construction and subsequent occupation of built infrastructure, generally ceases at the end of the service life. However, following demolition, recycling of demolition waste that becomes incorporated into 2nd generation construction is seldom considered within the management of the carbon footprint. This paper aims to focus on built concrete infrastructure, particularly the ability of recycled concrete to chemically react with airborne CO2, thereby significantly influencing CO2‐e estimates.

Design/methodology/approach – CO2‐e estimates were made in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Australian National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors and were based on the energy expended for each life cycle activity from audited records. Offsets to the CO2‐e estimates were based on the documented ability of concrete to chemically react with airborne carbon dioxide (“carbonation”) and predictions of CO2 uptake by concrete and recycled concrete was made using existing predictive diffusion models. The author's study focused on a built concrete bridge which was demolished and recycled at the end of the service life, and the recycled concrete was utilized towards 2nd generation construction. The sensitivity of CO2‐e and carbonation estimates were tested on several different types of source demolition waste as well as subsequent construction applications using recycled concrete (RCA). Whole‐of‐life CO2‐e estimates, including carbonation of RCA over the 1st and 2nd generations, were estimated and contrasted with conventional carbon footprints that end at the conclusion of the 1st generation.

Findings – Following demolition, CO2 capture by RCA is significant due to the more permeable nature of the crushed RCA compared with the original built infrastructure. RCA also has considerably greater exposed surface area, relative to volume, than a built concrete structure, and therefore more highly exposed surface to react with CO2: it therefore carbonates more comprehensively. CO2‐e estimates can be offset by as much as 55‐65 per cent when including the contribution of carbonation of RCA built within 2nd generation infrastructure. Further offsets are achievable using blended fly ash or slag cement binders; however, this study has focused on concrete composed of 100 per cent OPC binders and the effects of RCA.

Originality/value – Construction project estimates of life cycle CO2‐e emissions should include 2nd generation applications that follow the demolition of the 1st generation infrastructure. Life cycle estimates generally end at the time of demolition. However, by incorporating the recycled concrete demolition waste into the construction of 2nd generation infrastructure, the estimated CO2‐e is significantly offset during the 2nd generation life cycle by chemical uptake of CO2 (carbonation). This paper provides an approach towards inclusion of 2nd generation construction applications into whole‐of‐life estimates of CO2‐e.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/ECAM-09-2010-0072
Field of Research 090503 Construction Materials
Socio Economic Objective 870301 Cement and Concrete Materials
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2013, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30078497

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Institute for Frontier Materials
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 92 Abstract Views, 44 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 30 Sep 2015, 11:22:20 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.