You are not logged in.

Supermarkets and unhealthy food marketing: an international comparison of the content of supermarket catalogues/circulars

Charlton, Emma L., Kähkönen, Laila A., Sacks, Gary and Cameron, Adrian J. 2015, Supermarkets and unhealthy food marketing: an international comparison of the content of supermarket catalogues/circulars, Preventive medicine, vol. 81, pp. 168-173, doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.023.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Supermarkets and unhealthy food marketing: an international comparison of the content of supermarket catalogues/circulars
Author(s) Charlton, Emma L.
Kähkönen, Laila A.
Sacks, GaryORCID iD for Sacks, Gary orcid.org/0000-0001-9736-1539
Cameron, Adrian J.ORCID iD for Cameron, Adrian J. orcid.org/0000-0002-0568-5497
Journal name Preventive medicine
Volume number 81
Start page 168
End page 173
Total pages 6
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-12
ISSN 1096-0260
Keyword(s) Circular
Diet
Marketing
Obesity
Supermarket
Summary BACKGROUND: Supermarket marketing activities have a major influence on consumer food purchases. This study aimed to assess and compare the contents of supermarket marketing circulars from a range of countries worldwide from an obesity prevention perspective. METHODS: The contents of supermarket circulars from major supermarket chains in 12 non-random countries were collected and analysed over an eight week period from July to September 2014 (n=89 circulars with 12,563 food products). Circulars were largely English language and from countries representing most continents. Food products in 25 sub-categories were categorised as discretionary or non-discretionary (core) food or drinks based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. The total number of products in each subcategory in the whole circular, and on front covers only, was calculated. RESULTS: Circulars from most countries advertised a high proportion of discretionary foods. The only exceptions were circulars from the Philippines (no discretionary foods) and India (11% discretionary food). Circulars from six countries advertised more discretionary foods than core foods. Front covers tended to include a much greater proportion of healthy products than the circulars overall. CONCLUSIONS: Supermarket circulars in most of the countries examined include a high percentage of discretionary foods, and therefore promote unhealthy eating behaviours that contribute to the global obesity epidemic. A clear opportunity exists for supermarket circulars to promote rather than undermine healthy eating behaviours of populations. Governments need to ensure that supermarket marketing is included as part of broader efforts to restrict unhealthy food marketing.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.023
Field of Research 1106 Human Movement And Sports Science
1117 Public Health And Health Services
1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
Socio Economic Objective 920411 Nutrition
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30078538

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 95 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 07 Jan 2016, 10:16:42 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.