You are not logged in.

A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006

Harvey, Stephen and Jarrett, Kendall 2014, A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006, Physical education and sport pedagogy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 278-300, doi: 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006
Author(s) Harvey, Stephen
Jarrett, KendallORCID iD for Jarrett, Kendall orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-3028
Journal name Physical education and sport pedagogy
Volume number 19
Issue number 3
Start page 278
End page 300
Total pages 23
Publisher Routledge
Place of publication Abingdon, Eng.
Publication date 2014
ISSN 1740-8989
1742-5786
Keyword(s) game-centred approaches
teaching
coaching
review
Summary Background: In 2006, Oslin and Mitchell published a review of the game-centred approaches (GCAs) to teaching and coaching literature highlighting a number of core concepts thought to provide justification for the use of GCAs including (a) its potential to enhance participant motivation, (b) potential for tactical transfer, and (c) development of decision-making skills and effective decision-makers. Oslin and Mitchell also suggested recommendations for future GCA research.Purpose: The purpose of this paper was threefold: (a) to present a review of Anglophone research into GCAs building on the previous review of Oslin and Mitchell published in 2006; (b) to identify new trends in research since 2006; and (c) to investigate the extent to which the initial suggestions and future research directions suggested by Oslin and Mitchell have been addressed.Data collection: GCA literature since 2006 was searched systematically using a three-phase approach. Phase 1 included initial searches of the EBSCO database using terms associated with GCAs and their acronyms (e.g. TGfU (teaching games for understanding), GS (Game Sense), etc.). Phase 2 expanded the search adopting more generic terms from keywords located in the recent literature (e.g. teaching games, tactical development, game performance, etc.). Multiple searches through the EBSCO database were conducted, whereby key terms were cross-referenced until a saturation point was reached. Phase 3 involved removing those publications that were not empirical, peer reviewed, intervention studies or published in English.Findings: Forty-four studies on GCA implementation were identified and the methodological and substantive nature of these studies was examined. The review noted two positive trends: (a) the expansion of research which included the growth of research on GCAs in Europe and Southeast Asia and (b) an increased amount of research in the affective domain. The review found, however, that a number of key challenges remain within GCA research, which include (a) the need for improved articulation of GCA verification procedures; (b) further assessment of tactical awareness development; (c) extended inquiry about GCAs in coaching contexts; (d) more research into ‘newer’ GCAs (i.e. PP (play practice), IGCM (invasion game competence model) and TDLM (tactical decision learning model)); (e) use of longitudinal research designs; (f) inadequate length of GCA induction and training for teachers and coaches, and (g) examination of GCAs in terms of fitness and special populations.Conclusions: GCA pedagogies are of significant importance as they have the potential to promote change within current adult-centric cultures of youth sport and encourage engagement in physical activity over the life course. To meet these needs, it is recommended that GCA research undergo continued expansion with the use of research designs and data collection techniques that aid the examination of different philosophical understandings of GCAs (e.g. ethnographic, phenomenological and psycho-phenomenological). These are paramount to the exploration of ‘who the individual is’ and ‘how the learner is motivated to continue to participate’ and further permit the in-depth, contextual and ecological analysis of GCA interventions that Oslin and Mitchell recommended in their previous review.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005
Field of Research 130210 Physical Education and Development Curriculum and Pedagogy
1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
1303 Specialist Studies In Education
Socio Economic Objective 930201 Pedagogy
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2014, Routledge
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30078773

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Education
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 47 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 36 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 90 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 14:02:56 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.