You are not logged in.

A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare

Phillips, Nicole Margaret, Street, Maryann and Haesler, Emily 2015, A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare, BMJ quality & safety, vol. In press, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004357.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare
Author(s) Phillips, Nicole MargaretORCID iD for Phillips, Nicole Margaret orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-4983
Street, MaryannORCID iD for Street, Maryann orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-141X
Haesler, Emily
Journal name BMJ quality & safety
Volume number In press
Start page 1
End page 8
Total pages 8
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2015
ISSN 2044-5415
2044-5423
Keyword(s) Healthcare quality improvement
Patient-centred care
Shared decision making
Summary INTRODUCTION: Patient participation in healthcare is recognised internationally as essential for consumer-centric, high-quality healthcare delivery. Its measurement as part of continuous quality improvement requires development of agreed standards and measurable indicators. AIM: This systematic review sought to identify strategies to measure patient participation in healthcare and to report their reliability and validity. In the context of this review, patient participation was constructed as shared decision-making, acknowledging the patient as having critical knowledge regarding their own health and care needs and promoting self-care/autonomy. METHODS: Following a comprehensive search, studies reporting reliability or validity of an instrument used in a healthcare setting to measure patient participation, published in English between January 2004 and March 2014 were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: From an initial search, which identified 1582 studies, 156 studies were retrieved and screened against inclusion criteria. Thirty-three studies reporting 24 patient participation measurement tools met inclusion criteria, and were critically appraised. The majority of studies were descriptive psychometric studies using prospective, cross-sectional designs. Almost all the tools completed by patients, family caregivers, observers or more than one stakeholder focused on aspects of patient-professional communication. Few tools designed for completion by patients or family caregivers provided valid and reliable measures of patient participation. There was low correlation between many of the tools and other measures of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Few reliable and valid tools for measurement of patient participation in healthcare have been recently developed. Of those reported in this review, the dyadic Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (dyadic-OPTION) tool presents the most promise for measuring core components of patient participation. There remains a need for further study into valid, reliable and feasible strategies for measuring patient participation as part of continuous quality improvement.
Language eng
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004357
Field of Research 111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)
Socio Economic Objective 920210 Nursing
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, BMJ Publishing Group
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30079516

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Nursing and Midwifery
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 127 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Sat, 14 Nov 2015, 15:41:26 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.