You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

Infant feeding websites and apps: a systematic assessment of quality and content

Taki, Sarah, Campbell, Karen J., Russell, Catherine G., Elliott, Rosalind, Laws, Rachel and Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth 2015, Infant feeding websites and apps: a systematic assessment of quality and content, Interactive journal of medical research, vol. 4, no. 3, July - September, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4323.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
campbell-infantfeedings-2015.pdf Published version application/pdf 1.37MB 6

Title Infant feeding websites and apps: a systematic assessment of quality and content
Author(s) Taki, Sarah
Campbell, Karen J.ORCID iD for Campbell, Karen J. orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-3396
Russell, Catherine G.
Elliott, Rosalind
Laws, RachelORCID iD for Laws, Rachel orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1116
Denney-Wilson, Elizabeth
Journal name Interactive journal of medical research
Volume number 4
Issue number 3
Season July - September
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Publisher JMIR Publications
Place of publication Toronto, Ont.
Publication date 2015-07
ISSN 1929-073X
Keyword(s) applications
Internet
infant feeding
health information
quality
suitability
readability
Summary Background: Internet websites and smartphone apps have become a popular resource to guide parents in their children’s feeding and nutrition. Given the diverse range of websites and apps on infant feeding, the quality of information in these resources should be assessed to identify whether consumers have access to credible and reliable information.

Objective: This systematic analysis provides perspectives on the information available about infant feeding on websites and smartphone apps.

Methods: A systematic analysis was conducted to assess the quality, comprehensibility, suitability, and readability of websites and apps on infant feeding using a developed tool. Google and Bing were used to search for websites from Australia, while the App Store for iOS and Google Play for Android were used to search for apps. Specified key words including baby feeding, breast feeding, formula feeding and introducing solids were used to assess websites and apps addressing feeding advice. Criteria for assessing the accuracy of the content were developed using the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines.

Results: A total of 600 websites and 2884 apps were screened, and 44 websites and 46 apps met the selection criteria and were analyzed. Most of the websites (26/44) and apps (43/46) were noncommercial, some websites (10/44) and 1 app were commercial and there were 8 government websites; 2 apps had university endorsement. The majority of the websites and apps were rated poor quality. There were two websites that had 100% coverage of information compared to those rated as fair or poor that had low coverage. Two-thirds of the websites (65%) and almost half of the apps (47%) had a readability level above the 8th grade level.

Conclusions: The findings of this unique analysis highlight the potential for website and app developers to merge user requirements with evidence-based content to ensure that information on infant feeding is of high quality. There are currently no apps available to consumers that address a variety of infant feeding topics. To keep up with the rapid turnover of the evolving technology, health professionals need to consider developing an app that will provide consumers with a credible and reliable source of information about infant feeding, using quality assessment tools and evidence-based content.
Language eng
DOI 10.2196/ijmr.4323
Field of Research 111199 Nutrition and Dietetics not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920411 Nutrition
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, The Authors
Free to Read? Yes
Use Rights Creative Commons Attribution licence
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30080261

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 119 Abstract Views, 7 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 15 Dec 2015, 09:15:41 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.