Navigating the ethics of cross-cultural health promotion research

Lamaro Haintz, Greer, Graham, Melissa and McKenzie, Hayley 2015, Navigating the ethics of cross-cultural health promotion research, Health promotion journal of Australia, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 235-240, doi: 10.1071/HE15050.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Navigating the ethics of cross-cultural health promotion research
Author(s) Lamaro Haintz, Greer
Graham, MelissaORCID iD for Graham, Melissa
McKenzie, HayleyORCID iD for McKenzie, Hayley
Journal name Health promotion journal of Australia
Volume number 26
Issue number 3
Start page 235
End page 240
Total pages 6
Publisher CSIRO
Place of publication Melbourne, Vic.
Publication date 2015
ISSN 1036-1073
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Summary Health promotion researchers must consider the ethics of their research, and are usually required to abide by a set of ethical requirements stipulated by governing bodies (such as the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council) and human research ethics committees (HRECs). These requirements address both deontological (rule-based) and consequence-based issues. However, at times there can be a disconnect between the requirements of deontological issues and the cultural sensitivity required when research is set in cultural contexts and settings etic to the HREC. This poses a challenge for health promotion researchers who must negotiate between meeting both the requirements of the HREC and the needs of the community with whom the research is being conducted. Drawing on two case studies, this paper discusses examples from cross-cultural health promotion research in Australian and international settings where disconnect arose and negotiation was required to appropriately meet the needs of all parties. The examples relate to issues of participant recruitment and informed consent, participants under the Australian legal age of consent, participant withdrawal when this seemingly occurs in an ad hoc rather than a formal manner and reciprocity. Although these approaches are context specific, they highlight issues for consideration to advance more culturally appropriate practice in research ethics and suggest ways a stronger anthropological lens can be applied to research ethics to overcome these challenges.
Language eng
DOI 10.1071/HE15050
Field of Research 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
1117 Public Health And Health Services
Socio Economic Objective 920599 Specific Population Health (excl. Indigenous Health) not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, CSIRO Publishing
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 199 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 11 May 2016, 16:52:14 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact