You are not logged in.

The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education

Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng, Canny, Benedict J., Haines, Terry P. and Molloy, Elizabeth K. 2016, The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education, Advances in health sciences education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 659-676, doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education
Author(s) Tai, Joanna Hong-MengORCID iD for Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-2671
Canny, Benedict J.
Haines, Terry P.
Molloy, Elizabeth K.
Journal name Advances in health sciences education
Volume number 21
Issue number 3
Start page 659
End page 676
Total pages 18
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Publication date 2016-08
ISSN 1382-4996
1573-1677
Keyword(s) clinical placements
evaluative judgement
peer assisted learning
Social Sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Education & Educational Research
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Health Care Sciences & Services
SELF-ASSESSMENT
CONTROLLED-TRIAL
GROSS-ANATOMY
STUDENTS
FEEDBACK
CLERKSHIP
ASSESSMENTS
MODEL
Summary This study explored the contribution of peer-assisted learning (PAL) in the development of evaluative judgement capacity; the ability to understand work quality and apply those standards to appraising performance. The study employed a mixed methods approach, collecting self-reported survey data, observations of, and reflective interviews with, the medical students observed. Participants were in their first year of clinical placements. Data were thematically analysed. Students indicated that PAL contributed to both the comprehension of notions of quality, and the practice of making comparisons between a given performance and the standards. Emergent themes included peer story-telling, direct observation of performance, and peer-based feedback, all of which helped students to define 'work quality'. By participating in PAL, students were required to make comparisons, therefore using the standards of practice and gaining a deeper understanding of them. The data revealed tensions in that peers were seen as less threatening than supervisors with the advantage of increasing learners' appetites for thoughtful 'intellectual risk taking'. Despite this reported advantage of peer engagement, learners still expressed a preference for feedback from senior teachers as more trusted sources of clinical knowledge. While this study suggests that PAL already contributes to the development of evaluative judgement, further steps could be taken to formalise PAL in clinical placements to improve learners' capacity to make accurate judgements on the performance of self and others. Further experimental studies are necessary to confirm the best methods of using PAL to develop evaluative judgement. This may include both students and educators as instigators of PAL in the workplace.
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0
Field of Research 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy
1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
Socio Economic Objective 930102 Learner and Learning Processes
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, Springer
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30081090

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE)
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 49 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 02 Feb 2016, 13:29:24 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.