A succession of theories : purging redundancy from disturbance theory

Pulsford, Stephanie A., Lindenmayer, David B. and Driscoll, Don A. 2016, A succession of theories : purging redundancy from disturbance theory, Biological reviews, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 148-167, doi: 10.1111/brv.12163.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A succession of theories : purging redundancy from disturbance theory
Author(s) Pulsford, Stephanie A.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Driscoll, Don A.ORCID iD for Driscoll, Don A. orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235
Journal name Biological reviews
Volume number 91
Issue number 1
Start page 148
End page 167
Total pages 20
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2016-02
ISSN 1464-7931
Keyword(s) facilitation
habitat accommodation
initial floristic composition
intermediate disturbance hypothesis
life-history traits
neutral metacommunity
resource gradient
vital attributes
Summary The topics of succession and post-disturbance ecosystem recovery have a long and convoluted history. There is extensive redundancy within this body of theory, which has resulted in confusion, and the links among theories have not been adequately drawn. This review aims to distil the unique ideas from the array of theory related to ecosystem change in response to disturbance. This will help to reduce redundancy, and improve communication and understanding between researchers. We first outline the broad range of concepts that have developed over the past century to describe community change in response to disturbance. The body of work spans overlapping succession concepts presented by Clements in 1916, Egler in 1954, and Connell and Slatyer in 1977. Other theories describing community change include state and transition models, biological legacy theory, and the application of functional traits to predict responses to disturbance. Second, we identify areas of overlap of these theories, in addition to highlighting the conceptual and taxonomic limitations of each. In aligning each of these theories with one another, the limited scope and relative inflexibility of some theories becomes apparent, and redundancy becomes explicit. We identify a set of unique concepts to describe the range of mechanisms driving ecosystem responses to disturbance. We present a schematic model of our proposed synthesis which brings together the range of unique mechanisms that were identified in our review. The model describes five main mechanisms of transition away from a post-disturbance community: (i) pulse events with rapid state shifts; (ii) stochastic community drift; (iii) facilitation; (iv) competition; and (v) the influence of the initial composition of a post-disturbance community. In addition, stabilising processes such as biological legacies, inhibition or continuing disturbance may prevent a transition between community types. Integrating these six mechanisms with the functional trait approach is likely to improve the predictive capacity of disturbance theory. Finally, we complement our discussion of theory with a case study which emphasises that many post-disturbance theories apply simultaneously to the same ecosystem. Using the well-studied mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forests of south-eastern Australia, we illustrate phenomena that align with six of the theories described in our model of rationalised disturbance theory. We encourage further work to improve our schematic model, increase coverage of disturbance-related theory, and to show how the model may link to, or integrate with, other domains of ecological theory.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/brv.12163
Field of Research 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
Socio Economic Objective 970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2014, Cambridge Philosophical Society
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30081213

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 50 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 48 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 296 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 18 Mar 2016, 08:12:45 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.