Core components of communication of clinical reasoning: a qualitative study with experienced Australian physiotherapists

Ajjawi, Rola and Higgs, Joy 2012, Core components of communication of clinical reasoning: a qualitative study with experienced Australian physiotherapists, Advances in health sciences education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 107-119, doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9302-7.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Core components of communication of clinical reasoning: a qualitative study with experienced Australian physiotherapists
Author(s) Ajjawi, RolaORCID iD for Ajjawi, Rola
Higgs, Joy
Journal name Advances in health sciences education
Volume number 17
Issue number 1
Start page 107
End page 119
Total pages 13
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Berlin, Germany
Publication date 2012-03
ISSN 1573-1677
Keyword(s) Australia
interviews as topic
physical therapists
professional competence
Summary Communication is an important area in health professional education curricula, however it has been dealt with as discrete skills that can be learned and taught separate to the underlying thinking. Communication of clinical reasoning is a phenomenon that has largely been ignored in the literature. This research sought to examine how experienced physiotherapists communicate their clinical reasoning and to identify the core processes of this communication. A hermeneutic phenomenological research study was conducted using multiple methods of text construction including repeated semi-structured interviews, observation and written exercises. Hermeneutic analysis of texts involved iterative reading and interpretation of texts with the development of themes and sub-themes. Communication of clinical reasoning was perceived to be complex, dynamic and largely automatic. A key finding was that articulating reasoning (particularly during research) does not completely represent actual reasoning processes but represents a (re)construction of the more complex, rapid and multi-layered processes that operate in practice. These communications are constructed in ways that are perceived as being most relevant to the audience, context and purpose of the communication. Five core components of communicating clinical reasoning were identified: active listening, framing and presenting the message, matching the co-communicator, metacognitive aspects of communication and clinical reasoning abilities. We propose that communication of clinical reasoning is both an inherent part of reasoning as well as an essential and complementary skill based on the contextual demands of the task and situation. In this way clinical reasoning and its communication are intertwined, providing evidence for the argument that they should be learned (and explicitly taught) in synergy and in context.
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s10459-011-9302-7
Field of Research 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy
130202 Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Development
Socio Economic Objective 970113 Expanding Knowledge in Education
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2012, Springer
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education)
2018 ERA Submission
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 14 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 15 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 159 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 09 Feb 2016, 11:38:34 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact