You are not logged in.

Towards a conceptual framework on the categorization of stereotypical perceptions in accounting

Richardson, Peter, Dellaportas, Steven, Perera, Luckmika and Richardson, Ben 2015, Towards a conceptual framework on the categorization of stereotypical perceptions in accounting, Journal of accounting literature, vol. 35, pp. 28-46, doi: 10.1016/j.acclit.2015.09.002.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Towards a conceptual framework on the categorization of stereotypical perceptions in accounting
Author(s) Richardson, Peter
Dellaportas, Steven
Perera, LuckmikaORCID iD for Perera, Luckmika orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-818X
Richardson, Ben
Journal name Journal of accounting literature
Volume number 35
Start page 28
End page 46
Total pages 19
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-10
ISSN 0737-4607
Summary The stereotypical image of the profession is poor with accountants appearing in the popular media as either the object of satire or the criminally inclined expert who deceives the public for self-gain. Extant research on the portrayal of the stereotypic accountant is limited in two ways: (1) existing research assumes a unitary concept by inferring a dominant image when the accountant stereotype is multifaceted; and (2) it is unclear from existing research whether the dominant image results from perceived character traits or the duties undertaken by accountants. This paper relies on qualitative methods of data analysis to unpack the elements that underpin stereotypical images in accounting to develop a framework of external perceptions that distinguishes one image from another. The framework is constructed on two broad criteria that comprise accountants (personality traits and physical characteristics) and accounting (task functionality). The interplay of these two criteria creates four subtypes representing positive (Scorekeeper and Guardian) and negative (Beancounter and Entrepreneur) interpretations of the two basic categorizations: bookkeeper and business professional. Further analysis revealed four primary dimensions (Ethics and Sociable, Skill and Service) that underlie the construction of the subtypes. In general, the 'Scorekeeper' rates more highly than the 'Beancounter' on 'Ethics and Sociable' and the 'Guardian' rates more highly than the 'Entrepreneur' on 'Ethics'. Accounting researchers and the profession could benefit from understanding how stereotypical perceptions are constructed and managed.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.acclit.2015.09.002
Field of Research 150199 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30081292

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 102 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 10 Feb 2016, 13:55:25 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.