You are not logged in.

Assessing randomised clinical trials of cognitive and exposure therapies for gambling disorders : a systematic review

Smith, David P., Dunn, Kirsten I., Harvey, Peter W., Battersby, Malcolm W. and Pols, Rene G. 2013, Assessing randomised clinical trials of cognitive and exposure therapies for gambling disorders : a systematic review, Behaviour change, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 139-158, doi: 10.1017/bec.2013.15.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing randomised clinical trials of cognitive and exposure therapies for gambling disorders : a systematic review
Author(s) Smith, David P.
Dunn, Kirsten I.
Harvey, Peter W.
Battersby, Malcolm W.
Pols, Rene G.
Journal name Behaviour change
Volume number 30
Issue number 3
Start page 139
End page 158
Total pages 20
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Place of publication Cambridge, Eng.
Publication date 2013-08
ISSN 0813-4839
Keyword(s) gambling disorders
cognitive therapy
exposure therapy
randomised clinical trial
CONSORT statement
Summary Aims: Problem or pathological gambling is associated with significant disruption to the individual, family and community with a range of adverse outcomes, including legal, financial and mental health impairment. It occurs more frequently in younger populations, and comorbid conditions are common. Cognitive–behaviour therapy (CBT) is the most empirically established class of treatments for problematic gambling. This article reports on a systematic review and evaluation of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) concerning two core techniques of CBT: cognitive and behavioural (exposure-based) therapies. Methods: PsycINFO, MEDLINE and the Cochrane library were searched from database inception to December 2012. The CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for non-pharmacological treatments was used to evaluate each study. Results: The initial search identified 104 references. After two screening phases, seven RCTs evaluating either cognitive (n = 3), exposure (n = 3) or both (n = 1) interventions remained. The studies were published between 1983 and 2003 and conducted across Australia, Canada, and Spain. On average, approximately 31% of CONSORT items were rated as ‘absent’ for each study and more than 52% rated as ‘present with some limitations’. For all studies, 70.83% of items rated as ‘absent’ were in the methods section. Conclusions: The findings from this review of randomised clinical trials involving cognitive and exposure-based treatments for gambling disorders show that the current evidence base is limited. Trials with low risk of bias are needed to be reported before recommendations are given on their effectiveness and clinicians can appraise their potential utility with confidence.
Language eng
DOI 10.1017/bec.2013.15
Field of Research 111714 Mental Health
Socio Economic Objective 920410 Mental Health
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2013, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30081526

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 48 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 22 Feb 2016, 11:37:40 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.