Physical activity of children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries
Tremblay, Mark S., Gray, Casey E., Akinroye, Kingsley, Harrington, Diedre M., Katzmarzyk, Peter T., Lambert, Estelle V., Liukkonen, Jarmo, Maddison, Ralph, Ocansey, Reginald T., Onywera, Vincent O., Prista, Antonio, Reilly, John J., Rodríguez Martínez, Maria del Pilar, Sarmiento Duenas, Olga L., Standage, Martyn and Tomkinson, Grant 2014, Physical activity of children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries, Journal of physical activity and health, vol. 11, no. 4 Supp 1, pp. S113-S125, doi: 10.1123/jpah.11.s1.s113.
Attached Files
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Physical activity of children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries
The Active Healthy Kids Canada (AHKC) Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth has been effective in poweringthe movement to get kids moving by influencing priorities, policies, and practice in Canada. The AHKC Report Card process wasreplicated in 14 additional countries from 5 continents using 9 common indicators (Overall Physical Activity, Organized SportParticipation, Active Play, Active Transportation, Sedentary Behavior, Family and Peers, School, Community and Built Environment,and Government Strategies and Investments), a harmonized process and a standardized grading framework. The 15 ReportCards were presented at the Global Summit on the Physical Activity of Children in Toronto on May 20, 2014. The consolidatedfindings are summarized here in the form of a global matrix of grades. There is a large spread in grades across countries for mostindicators. Countries that lead in certain indicators lag in others. Overall, the grades for indicators of physical activity (PA) aroundthe world are low/poor. Many countries have insufficient information to assign a grade, particularly for the Active Play and Familyand Peers indicators. Grades for Sedentary Behaviors are, in general, better in low income countries. The Community and BuiltEnvironment indicator received high grades in high income countries and notably lower grades in low income countries. There wasa pattern of higher PA and lower sedentary behavior in countries reporting poorer infrastructure, and lower PA and higher sedentarybehavior in countries reporting better infrastructure, which presents an interesting paradox. Many surveillance and researchgaps and weaknesses were apparent. International cooperation and cross-fertilization is encouraged to tackle existing challenges,understand underlying mechanisms, derive innovative solutions, and overcome the expanding childhood inactivity crisis.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.