Self-report use-of-time tools for the assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: systematic review Foley, L., Maddison, R., Olds, T. and Ridley, K. 2012, Self-report use-of-time tools for the assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: systematic review, Obesity reviews, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 711-722, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.00993.x. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Self-report use-of-time tools for the assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: systematic review Author(s) Foley, L. Maddison, R. orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-5518 Olds, T. Ridley, K. Journal name Obesity reviews Volume number 13 Issue number 8 Start page 711 End page 722 Total pages 12 Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Place of publication Chichester, Eng. Publication date 2012-08 ISSN 1467-789X Keyword(s) Adolescent Child Child Behavior Energy Metabolism Exercise Health Behavior Health Status Humans Reproducibility of Results Risk Reduction Behavior Sedentary Lifestyle Self Report Summary UNLABELLED: Regular physical activity and limiting extended periods of sitting are two behaviours critical for the prevention of obesity in young people. The purpose of the systematic review was to synthesize the psychometric evidence for self-report use-of-time tools that assess these behaviours. Articles were retrieved that reported reliability and/or validity for use-of-time tools in participants aged 18 years or under. Outcome variables were physical activity, sedentary behaviour and energy expenditure. Study quality was appraised, and the results summarized narratively. Sixteen studies and six different tools were identified. The tools were the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall, the Three-Day Physical Activity Recall, the Physical Activity Interview, the Computerized Activity Recall, the Activitygram, and the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents. Overall, tools indicated moderate validity compared with objective and criterion comparison methods. Generally, validity correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.30-0.40. Correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged widely from 0.24 to 0.98. CONCLUSION: Use-of-time tools have indicated moderate reliability and validity for the assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure. Future research should focus on using criterion methods and on validating specifically for sedentary behaviour outcomes. Implementation of these tools for population surveillance should be considered. Language eng DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.00993.x Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified Socio Economic Objective 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal ERA Research output type C Journal article Copyright notice ©2012, The Authors Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30081946 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Related Links Link Description Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Versions Version Filter Type Mon, 07 Mar 2016, 11:08:48 EST Tue, 08 Mar 2016, 04:03:36 EST Tue, 08 Mar 2016, 05:09:05 EST Thu, 22 Sep 2016, 11:32:22 EST Thu, 22 Sep 2016, 11:33:57 EST Thu, 22 Sep 2016, 11:37:30 EST Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 01:52:19 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 26 times in TR Web of Science Cited 29 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 353 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Mon, 07 Mar 2016, 11:08:48 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.