You are not logged in.

Incorporating regional-scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programmes

Kay, G.M., Barton, P.S., Driscoll, D.A., Cunningham, S.A., Blanchard, W., Mcintyre, S. and Lindenmayer, D.B. 2016, Incorporating regional-scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programmes, Animal conservation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 515-525, doi: 10.1111/acv.12267.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Incorporating regional-scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programmes
Author(s) Kay, G.M.
Barton, P.S.
Driscoll, D.A.ORCID iD for Driscoll, D.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235
Cunningham, S.A.
Blanchard, W.
Mcintyre, S.
Lindenmayer, D.B.
Journal name Animal conservation
Volume number 19
Issue number 6
Start page 515
End page 525
Total pages 11
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2016-12
ISSN 1367-9430
1469-1795
Keyword(s) agri-environment schemes
agro-ecology
agricultural landscapes
ecosystem services
Environmental Stewardship Programme
herpetofauna
South-eastern Australia
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Biodiversity Conservation
Ecology
Biodiversity & Conservation
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
BIODIVERSITY
REPTILES
LANDSCAPE
DIVERSITY
MANAGEMENT
WOODLANDS
PATTERNS
Summary Land-stewardship programmes are a major focus of investment by governments for conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. These programmes are generally large-scale (e.g. >1000 km) spanning multiple biogeographic regions but developed using spatially limited (e.g. landscape-scale; <100 km) ecological data interpolated across broad areas for one, or a few, well-studied taxonomic groups. Information about how less-studied taxa respond to regional differences in management and environmental effects has potential to further inform land-stewardship conservation programmes, but suitable data sets are rarely available. In this study, we sought to enhance planning of large-scale conservation programmes by quantifying relationships between reptile assemblages and key environmental attributes at regional scales within a large-scale (>172 000 km2) Australian land-stewardship programme. Using 234 remnant woodland monitoring sites spanning four distinct biogeographic regions, we asked: Do reptile assemblages show different environmental associations across biogeographically distinct regions? We found that environmental features important to reptile diversity differed over each region. Abundance and rare species richness of reptiles responded at regional-scales to elevation, native groundcover and aspect. We identified four implications from our study: (1) large-scale conservation schemes can achieve better outcomes for reptiles using regional-scale knowledge of environmental associations; (2) regional-scale knowledge is particularly valuable for conservation of rare reptile taxa; (3) consideration of abiotic environmental features which cannot be directly managed (e.g. aspect, elevation) is important; (4) programmes can be tailored to better support reptile groups at higher conservation risk. Our study shows that reptile-environment associations differ among biogeographic regions, and this presents opportunity for tailoring stronger policy and management strategies for conserving large-scale agricultural landscapes globally.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/acv.12267
Field of Research 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
070301 Agro-Ecosystem Function and Prediction
Socio Economic Objective 970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Wiley- Blackwell
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30082475

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 27 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 11 Oct 2016, 08:48:40 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.