A comparison of different study load classifications and their association to student performance: an exploratory study

Perera, Luckmika, Kanapathippillai, Sutharson and Wines, Graeme 2016, A comparison of different study load classifications and their association to student performance: an exploratory study, Asian review of accounting, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 134-148, doi: 10.1108/ARA-02-2014-0022.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A comparison of different study load classifications and their association to student performance: an exploratory study
Author(s) Perera, LuckmikaORCID iD for Perera, Luckmika orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-818X
Kanapathippillai, SutharsonORCID iD for Kanapathippillai, Sutharson orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-5780
Wines, Graeme
Journal name Asian review of accounting
Volume number 24
Issue number 2
Start page 134
End page 148
Total pages 15
Publisher Emerald
Place of publication Bingley, Eng.
Publication date 2016
Summary Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the alternative study load measures (dichotomous full-time/part-time classification and the number of units enrolled) and their association to student performance by using student data from a final year accounting unit in a large Australian university.

Design/methodology/approach – Using regression analysis, the authors compare the two measures to ascertain the explanatory power of the two approaches in explaining student performance.

Findings – A positive association is found between study loads and student performance when using the “number of units enrolled” measure. This relationship was not found when the dichotomous measure (full-time vs part-time) was used. The results suggest that a scaled measure of study loads is a better measure compared to a binary (dichotomous) measure.

Research limitations/implications – The study will assist future researchers to better control for study loads, and also to gain a better understanding of the association between study loads and student performance. This may possibly assist educational institutions and academics to use a more appropriate pedagogical design in the structure of courses when determining study load allocations across the different cohorts.

Practical implications – This study will help in methodology of future researchers controlling for study loads and student performance.
Originality/value – The study adds to existing literature by providing an alternate study load measure in methodology for controlling for student performance.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/ARA-02-2014-0022
Field of Research 130103 Higher Education
Socio Economic Objective 930599 Education and Training Systems not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30082508

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
Department of Accounting
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 461 Abstract Views, 5 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 31 Mar 2016, 14:50:44 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.