Actors and agency in academic language policy and planning

Fenton-Smith, Ben and Gurney, Laura 2016, Actors and agency in academic language policy and planning, Current issues in language planning, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 72-87, doi: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1115323.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Actors and agency in academic language policy and planning
Author(s) Fenton-Smith, Ben
Gurney, Laura
Journal name Current issues in language planning
Volume number 17
Issue number 1
Start page 72
End page 87
Total pages 16
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016
ISSN 1466-4208
1747-7506
Keyword(s) language policy and planning
academic language and learning
actors
agency
higher education
Summary Nearly two decades have passed since Kaplan and Baldauf [1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters] drew attention to the dearth of language policy and planning (LPP) in higher education. Despite the continuing inflow of English as an additional language students into Anglophone universities, and a boom in English-medium instruction policies in non-Anglophone tertiary institutions [Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council], LPP research remains relatively underdeveloped in higher education. We suggest that current understandings of academic language policy and planning in higher education would benefit from contextualised analyses of actors and agency [Chua, C. S. K., & Baldauf, R. B. (2011). Micro language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 936–951). New York, NY: Routledge; Zhao, S. H., 2011. Actors in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 905–923). New York, NY: Routledge; Zhao, S. H., & Baldauf, R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems & Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24]. In order to address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 academic language program planners at different universities across Australia. We examined how the micro-level processes of program development and implementation were both constrained and enabled by the participation of different actor groups, operating at different levels (micro, meso, macro) and each with their own capacity to influence change. We conclude by arguing that coherent university-wide language policies, formulated by decision-making bodies representative of a variety of stakeholder groups and sensitive to program implementation needs at the micro level, represent a step towards improving the current situation.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/14664208.2016.1115323
Field of Research 130207 Lote, Esl and Tesol Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl Maori)
2004 Linguistics
Socio Economic Objective 930501 Education and Training Systems Policies and Development
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Taylor & Francis
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30082755

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Education
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 7 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 110 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 03 May 2016, 09:47:19 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.