You are not logged in.

The impact of occupant behaviour on residential greenhouse gas emissions reduction

Hetherington, Joshua, Roetzel, Astrid and Fuller, Robert 2015, The impact of occupant behaviour on residential greenhouse gas emissions reduction, Journal of green building, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 127-140, doi: 10.3992/jgb.10.4.127.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The impact of occupant behaviour on residential greenhouse gas emissions reduction
Author(s) Hetherington, Joshua
Roetzel, AstridORCID iD for Roetzel, Astrid orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-7744
Fuller, Robert
Journal name Journal of green building
Volume number 10
Issue number 4
Start page 127
End page 140
Total pages 14
Publisher College Publishing
Place of publication Glen Allen, Va.
Publication date 2015-09-01
ISSN 1552-6100
1943-4618
Keyword(s) ranking
occupant behavior impact
greenhouse gas emissions
simulations
Summary In 2011-12, greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian residential sector were 101.6 Mt and are expected to grow by 38% by 2050. In order to reduce these emissions, much emphasis has been placed on increasing the energy efficiency of buildings and appliances. Occupant behaviour, however, is probably the single most significant factor which determines energy use and emissions. This paper describes research undertaken to rank the most common occupant behaviours, based upon their impact on greenhouse gas emissions associated with residential energy use, in an architect-designed house in Australia. The occupant behaviours investigated were changing: the heating and cooling temperature set points, window openings, external blind use and lighting use. Simulations were carried out using Primero and EnergyPlus software. Based on the simulation results of greenhouse gas emissions, the following ranking of overall influence (from most influential to the least) has been determined: external blind use was one of the most effective measures to reduce emissions. Cooling set point temperature was similarly important with the magnitude of impact depending on the set point e.g. a 2°C increase had an impact comparable to the use of external blinds. The impact of the heating set point temperature was also dependent on the set point and overall slightly lower compared to the cooling set point temperature. Lighting use was the least influential parameter in the context of this study.
Language eng
DOI 10.3992/jgb.10.4.127
Field of Research 120104 Architectural Science and Technology (incl Acoustics, Lighting, Structure and Ecologically Sustainable Design)
1202 Building
1201 Architecture
Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, College Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30082879

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Architecture and Built Environment
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 2 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 3 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 102 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 12 Jul 2016, 15:47:13 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.